University of Dhaka
#584
QS World University Rankings 2026
28.7
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#584
QS World University Rankings 2026
#554
QS World University Rankings 2025
28.7
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 30.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #401
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 51.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #242
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 10.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 6.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 2.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 1.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 1.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 57.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #720
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 97
- QS 2026 rank
- #59
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 54.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #619
About University of Dhaka
University of Dhaka separates faculties, departments, institutes, centres, journals, collaboration, and integrity
The University of Dhaka presents a broad public research structure through faculties, departments, institutes, research centres and bureaus, research and publications, research collaboration, university journals, and a research-integrity framework. This is valuable because it separates organisational settings from publication routes and research-process material. A faculty or department can offer an academic home. A centre or bureau may identify a continuing setting. A journal or publications page can lead to a visible output. A collaboration route can show a relationship beyond the university. An integrity framework points to research responsibilities. These routes are useful for discovery, but they do not each establish the same kind of claim about an active study.
A practical search begins by naming a precise research object, such as a physical system, mathematical model, chemical process, biological sample, public-health issue, legal rule, business decision, social practice, environmental condition, media text, language, or cultural artefact. The evidence needed will differ. A science question may call for an experiment, sample, measurement, simulation, or dataset. A law or social-science question may rely on statutes, public records, interviews, observations, survey material, or historical documents. Once the object is clear, a faculty, department, institute, centre, publication, or researcher page can be evaluated for whether it identifies the same question in a stated local context.
Dhaka research routes make sciences, law, business, health, arts, and social research distinct starting points
The University of Dhaka research-and-publication page lists departments across arts, science, law, business studies, social sciences, biological sciences, pharmacy, earth and environmental sciences, engineering and technology, fine art, education, medicine, and postgraduate medical sciences and research. The public list includes physics, mathematics, chemistry, statistics, biomedical physics and technology, theoretical and computational chemistry, economics, political science, anthropology, public health, microbiology, fisheries, genetic engineering and biotechnology, and many humanities and arts fields. This range is useful as a map, but it should not be read as one shared research method. Each subject needs a defined object and evidence trail.
For example, a biomedical-physics question may require a measurement system, image, physical model, medical context, and validation. A genetic-engineering question can involve biological material, sequences, laboratory procedures, or a defined organism or process. An environmental question may need soil, water, site observations, chemistry, maps, policy, or public records. A political, social, or cultural question might depend on institutions, documents, interviews, media, historical sources, or participant experience. The public department list helps a reader locate a likely academic setting, while a closer research or publication record is needed to determine what a particular unit is actually studying.
Choose a University of Dhaka research route by the material needed to answer one defined question
A focused University of Dhaka search starts by writing a question that makes the evidence visible. Set out the object, its local setting, and the materials that could support a credible answer. A technical question might name a device, model, material, system, codebase, or experiment. A health question could name a biological signal, clinical process, service, environment, or population. A social question may identify a policy, organisation, record, community practice, media item, or historical event. This preparation helps choose whether a faculty, department, institute, centre, publication route, journal, or research collaboration page is the strongest next place to look.
The official sources show an extensive research navigation with multiple academic and publication routes. They do not confirm that an individual team is currently taking on a proposed subject, that a listed department uses a particular method, or that a general research centre gives access to a resource. A precise statement requires a local official record that connects the object, setting, and activity. If the available page only gives a nearby academic field, it can still be retained as a useful direction for later review. This keeps the Dhaka profile practical for research discovery while staying within the limits of what public overview pages can establish.
Institution record
- Country
- Bangladesh
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.