Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
#801
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#801
QS World University Rankings 2026
#781
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 26.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #485
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 8.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 25.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #731
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 15.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #786
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 5.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 8.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 64.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #631
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 23.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #659
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 65.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #393
About Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
UFSC brings research groups, shared laboratories, and coordination into one visible structure
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina presents research and innovation through a dedicated pro-rectorate with research coordination, administrative support, a research chamber, research groups, indicators, central multi-user laboratories, and institutional systems for recording activity. The layout is useful because a research environment is made of more than departments. A group can bring a shared question into focus. A central facility can make specialised instruments available across more than one field. A research chamber can give institutional form to discussion and review. A record system can help trace projects, people, and activity. These functions are different, yet together they make it easier to see how an idea can be developed with appropriate materials and responsible procedures.
The university also lists committees concerned with biosafety, animal use, and research involving human participants. Their presence is important when a question touches living organisms, people, samples, personal information, or a potentially harmful process. A well-defined study does not treat care and responsibility as an afterthought. It considers the type of material involved, who may be affected, and what safeguards the work requires. This applies across a wide range of themes. A biological question may need a laboratory protocol. A study involving people may need careful consent and data handling. An environmental investigation may need attention to a site, species, or community. UFSC's visible structures make these distinctions easier to recognise early.
At UFSC, research can take different forms across humanities, life, exact, earth, and engineering fields
The research area at UFSC brings together groups, laboratory facilities, researcher information, scientific integrity guidance, and public research news. Its current activity also shows work across humanities, life sciences, exact and earth sciences, agriculture, food science, ecology, physics, education, and environmental engineering. This breadth should not flatten a question into a vague interdisciplinary claim. A humanities enquiry may rely on texts, history, language, interviews, or social observation. In the life sciences, a question might centre on an organism, tissue, molecule, ecological relationship, or food-related process. A physics or engineering question may depend on a material, model, instrument, force, or designed system. Each route needs its own form of evidence.
Central multi-user facilities are particularly meaningful when a question depends on an observation that cannot be made by ordinary inspection. Microscopy, biological study, and other shared technical capabilities can support work where scale, image quality, sample preparation, or measurement conditions matter. Yet a facility is not the question itself. A strong UFSC enquiry explains the phenomenon under examination, the context in which it occurs, and the record that could show a difference. For a food topic, that might be a product, process, organism, or nutritional pattern. For an ecological topic, it could be a species, habitat, exposure, or interaction. For a technical topic, it may be a material, system, signal, or performance measure.
UFSC research becomes easier to navigate when a topic is linked to a method and a responsible setting
A practical way to read UFSC's research map is to start with one precise relationship. It could be a change in a biological sample, a pattern in a physical system, a teaching practice, an environmental condition, or a cultural record. Then decide what would reveal that relationship: measurements, samples, images, documents, interviews, observations, code, or a structured comparison. This choice narrows the possible setting without forcing a topic into a single discipline. It can indicate whether the work needs a research group, a shared laboratory, an institutional record, or a carefully managed study involving people or living systems.
The university's research coordination, integrity guidance, and visible facilities give this process a useful frame. They suggest that a good question is not only interesting in the abstract; it must also be possible to investigate with suitable methods and care for the people, materials, and environments involved. Readers looking across UFSC's many fields can keep the search grounded by naming the object, the condition, and the evidence first. The relevant group or laboratory then becomes easier to identify because it is connected to an actual research task rather than only to a familiar subject word.
Institution record
- Country
- Brazil
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.