Fudan University
#30
QS World University Rankings 2026
88.4
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#30
QS World University Rankings 2026
#39
QS World University Rankings 2025
88.4
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 93.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #50
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 95.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #49
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 84.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #137
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 92.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #89
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 88.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #234
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 46.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #433
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 51.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #402
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 75.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #431
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 73.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #193
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 83.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #134
About Fudan University
A broad faculty structure with distinct research homes
Fudan University describes an academic structure that spans philosophy, economics, law, education, literature, history, science, engineering, medicine, management, and arts. Its official information also identifies schools and departments, affiliated hospitals, and a separate set of faculties. For a STEM applicant, the important point is not the size of the list. It is that a broad institution can place related work in several different academic homes. A question in computational health, materials, data, environmental systems, or another applied area may connect to science or engineering, but it may also sit beside medicine, management, or a cross-disciplinary platform. Start by finding the smallest unit that owns the subject, then follow its current work rather than stopping at the university overview.
The university's faculty and research pages separate humanities and social sciences from science, engineering, and medicine while also referring to institutes, platforms, projects, and research administration. That separation is useful for reading the site. A faculty page gives the broad disciplinary setting; a department, institute, or laboratory page is more likely to show the methods, people, and active questions behind a possible research route. If your interest crosses fields, do not assume that an institutional connection automatically creates a study path. Look for the units that actually describe joint work, shared facilities, or current projects in the area you want to pursue.
Reading research context without overgeneralising
Fudan's official pages describe research activity through schools, departments, affiliated hospitals, institutes, and other platforms. The humanities and social sciences material also refers to research institutes, research bases, and work that links social questions with frontier technologies. This does not mean that every field follows the same model. It does show why a prospective researcher should check the local organisation of a subject. A department may be the main academic home in one area, while an institute, hospital-linked unit, or research platform may play a more central role in another. Mapping those relationships before making a shortlist can prevent a broad university profile from being mistaken for a description of one research group.
The university's history and Shanghai setting provide useful background, but they should not replace present-day evidence. For current research fit, read recent department news, group pages, staff profiles, and project descriptions alongside the institutional overview. Ask simple questions: what problem is the group working on now, what tools or materials appear in its work, and where does a student fit into that structure? Keep a distinction between an area that appears on a university page and a research direction that is visibly active in the unit you are considering. This will make later comparisons clearer and reduce the risk of writing a generic statement that does not connect to a real academic home.
Building a precise research shortlist
A focused Fudan shortlist entry should begin with an academic question, not a general interest in a large university. Identify the faculty, school, department, or institute that relates to the question, then find a small number of people or groups whose current work is relevant. Record the terms the unit uses to describe the topic, because these are often more useful than broad labels. If the work is connected to medicine, engineering, science, or an interdisciplinary platform, note that relationship and check which unit has responsibility for the academic route.
Use the official university material as a map and programme-level information as the final check for your own path. Institutional pages can show the range of faculties and research settings, but they cannot answer every question about a specific subject. Confirm current details directly with the relevant school, department, or research unit before relying on them. The QS information above is university-level data with a clear source and year. It is not a judgement about every field at Fudan University or a substitute for checking the current setting of the research you want to do.
Institution record
- Country
- China (Mainland)
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- October 31, 2025
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.