QS ranking profile
Nanjing University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #103
- Up 42 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #145
- Overall score
- 67.7
Explore opportunities at Nanjing University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#128 worldwide
#188 worldwide
#541 worldwide
#39 worldwide
#273 worldwide
#799 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#541 worldwide
#440 worldwide
#513 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Extra large
- More than 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Asia
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Nanjing University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Nanjing University separates science from humanities and social research
Nanjing University presents research through two clearly labelled routes: science and technology, and humanities and social sciences. Each route has its own office, research achievements, and lists of laboratories, centres, or institutes. This is a useful starting distinction because the same public problem can be approached through different evidence and methods. A data question may be technical in one setting and social in another; an environmental question may involve physical science, governance, history, or a combination. Begin by deciding what kind of question you are asking before selecting a centre from the wider institutional list.
The science and technology route directs readers toward laboratories and centres, while the humanities and social sciences route points to institutes and centres. That wording provides an initial clue about the organisational language used in each area. It does not decide where a topic belongs. Use it to locate the smallest relevant unit, then examine whether its current description gives the research object a clear form. A serious comparison should identify more than a shared theme. It should show the problem, the likely approach, and the setting in which the work is publicly described.
Named centres reveal the different scales of a research question
Nanjing University's public institutes and centres page includes the Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, alongside centres concerned with new literature, public affairs and local governance, Marxist social theory, linguistic and strategic studies, Yangtze River Delta economic and social development, risk, disaster and crisis, and other topics. This variety is useful because it shows that a phrase such as data, risk, or development does not have one fixed academic home. The laboratory or centre name can help narrow the search, but the description of its current work must determine whether the connection is substantive.
For instance, the Data Engineering and Knowledge Service laboratory provides a more technical entry point than a general institutional statement about digital work. A centre on risk, disaster, and crisis may frame a problem through organisational or social inquiry rather than through geophysics or engineering. The right choice depends on the research question and the methods needed to answer it. Write down the unit name, the visible topic, and the language that signals its disciplinary orientation. Then seek a group, project, or researcher page that can confirm whether the relevant work is active and close enough to compare.
A two-route map calls for a careful Nanjing comparison
A useful Nanjing University entry can begin by declaring whether the question sits primarily in science and technology, humanities and social sciences, or at an intersection. Use the relevant research route to find a laboratory, centre, or institute, then state exactly what that unit appears to study. A connection may rest on knowledge services, a technical system, a regional problem, a cultural object, a social process, or a method shared across fields. The connection should be written narrowly enough that it could be tested against current local material rather than supported by a general phrase about interdisciplinary research.
The university's central research pages make a broad landscape visible, but the strongest evidence remains close to the unit itself. Keep a distinction between what the navigation confirms and what you still need to learn from people or projects. If a centre's title looks relevant but its recent work is unclear, treat it as a search lead. If current research material shows the object and method, the note can become more confident. This approach respects the university's separate research routes while making room for questions that genuinely cross the line between them.