Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)
#343
QS World University Rankings 2026
41.8
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#343
QS World University Rankings 2026
#284
QS World University Rankings 2025
41.8
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 14.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 9.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 87.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #116
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 100
- QS 2026 rank
- #14
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 42.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #479
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 2.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 7.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 47.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 1.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 65.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #387
About Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)
SUSTech links its academic schools with a wide research structure
Southern University of Science and Technology, or SUSTech, presents schools and colleges in science, engineering, business, medicine, innovation and entrepreneurship, humanities and social sciences, design, and life sciences. Its central English site places that academic structure beside a research route. This gives a reader more than one way to approach a question. A school can identify a disciplinary setting, while the research pages can point to centres, facilities, institutional platforms, and current activity. The two routes should be used together. A school name alone may be too broad, and a central research page may not show the local method or group behind a narrow topic.
The home page also frames research as a collaborative part of university life and makes events from several fields visible. A topic in materials, health, data, physics, design, or environmental study may therefore have more than one possible academic home. That does not mean those homes use the same evidence or follow the same approach. A reader should write the question in a concrete form before choosing a route. The question may concern a molecular process, device, data system, physical interaction, ecological condition, or social practice. Once the object is clear, the local SUSTech page can be assessed more carefully.
Research centres and service platforms describe different kinds of SUSTech setting
SUSTech's research overview separates research centres and facilities, technology transfer, research news, and research administration. It also names public research service platforms including the Center for Computational Science and Engineering, the Laboratory Animal Research Center, Core Research Facilities, and the Cryo-Electron Microscopy Center. These names are useful because they point toward very different forms of research material and practice. Computational work may depend on models, software, and data. Animal research involves a different type of setting. Cryo-electron microscopy points toward imaging and structural investigation. A platform name is a clue to a research environment, not proof of a particular project or access arrangement.
The same overview describes research institutions and platforms as places that bring together talent, equipment, academic exchange, and research output. It also refers to interdisciplinary research centres and an office that handles parts of research administration. These descriptions explain how the university organises research at an institutional level. They do not show which team is working on a narrowly defined question today. For a useful comparison, move from the broad platform or centre to the closest available local page. Look for a named research object, a public project, a research group, or a visible form of evidence before drawing a connection.
SUSTech schools, centres, and platforms anchor a focused evidence check
A practical SUSTech search begins with the thing that needs to be understood. It might be a material property, a cellular process, an engineering device, a computational task, a health question, a design problem, or an environmental condition. Then specify what would count as evidence: a sample, instrument reading, image, experimental result, dataset, model, record, field observation, or interview. With those two details in hand, a reader can compare the question with a school, centre, facility, or research platform. This prevents a broad label such as science or innovation from doing too much work in the comparison.
The final note should identify what SUSTech's public pages actually make visible and what still requires a closer check. The central research overview can locate a platform or institutional route. A school page can establish the disciplinary context. A research-news item may identify a recent subject. None of them automatically confirms an individual path, current equipment use, or a specific team relationship. Keeping the note at that evidence level makes it easier to revise later when a local page provides more detail. It also makes the university's broad research map genuinely useful for a focused inquiry.
Institution record
- Country
- China (Mainland)
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- M
- Profile record updated
- October 31, 2025
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.