Universidad de Los Andes Colombia
#212
QS World University Rankings 2026
54.6
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#212
QS World University Rankings 2026
#179
QS World University Rankings 2025
54.6
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 81.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #92
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 90.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #70
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 17.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 10.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 28.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #597
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 3.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 7.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 54.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #774
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 98.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #35
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 75.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #223
About Universidad de Los Andes Colombia
Research and creation at Uniandes connect academic work with public questions
Universidad de los Andes in Colombia, commonly called Uniandes, presents research and creation as activities connected with environmental, social, and economic questions. Its public pages show projects and stories that move between scientific work, cultural heritage, public debate, entrepreneurship, and community life. Examples include an exhibition about science in neighbourhood life, analysis of Colombia's constitutional history, work supporting the recognition of cultural heritage in Bojayá, and discussion of artificial intelligence in organisations. These examples do not represent a single research method. They illustrate how a university can bring different forms of evidence into view, from legal and historical documents to community experience, technical systems, and public policy questions.
This public range is useful when it is treated as a starting point for a specific inquiry. A project related to neighbourhood life may need participatory work, local records, or social research. A constitutional question may need legal texts and historical interpretation. Cultural heritage work can require documentation, conservation knowledge, and collaboration with public institutions. A question about artificial intelligence in organisations may call for technical, managerial, or social evidence. The university's central news page helps identify these distinct directions. The next check should find the local research group, centre, project, or faculty setting that makes the research object and method explicit.
The research and creation structure makes projects, knowledge sharing, and facilities visible
Uniandes' research and creation area describes a network that includes project maps and portfolios, research and innovation pathways, centres, core facilities, research groups, student research initiatives, repositories, library resources, and platforms for sharing knowledge. This organisation matters because different kinds of research need different support. A centre may bring people together around a complex social or scientific question. A core facility can provide specialised capability. A project portfolio can show active work across themes. A repository can preserve and make research outputs easier to find. These functions are related, but they should not be confused with one another or used as proof of an individual project's method.
The public material also emphasises open knowledge and the co-creation of knowledge with communities outside the university. That is a meaningful research practice, especially for questions whose evidence comes from public life, local organisations, cultural settings, or social needs. At the same time, an open-knowledge commitment does not tell a reader how every project is designed or who is involved. A robust profile links the general structure to a named local activity. It should identify the question, the people or materials involved, the relevant research group or facility, and the route through which results may be shared. This makes the institution's broad language useful without making claims beyond the source.
Create a Uniandes research record that stays close to the evidence
A good Uniandes research note begins with an issue that can be investigated rather than an attractive institutional phrase. It may concern a community, heritage object, environmental condition, legal process, technical system, cultural practice, business problem, or scientific sample. Identify the source of evidence that the question requires, then look for the research group, project map, centre, or facility that clearly relates to it. State whether the connection is through documents, interviews, observations, measurements, computational data, archival material, or collaborative work with a community. This gives the reader a clear way to compare research settings across very different fields.
End by marking any point that still needs a local source. A public story can show recent work but may not describe a longer project. A project portfolio can identify a theme while leaving the current research team unclear. A repository can make results discoverable without explaining how the evidence was collected. These limits are useful because they prevent a broad public profile from becoming a general claim about all academic activity. Uniandes offers visible paths through research, creation, open knowledge, facilities, and public engagement. A careful evidence trail turns those paths into a specific understanding of a possible research environment.
Institution record
- Country
- Colombia
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Private not for Profit
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.