Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
#206
QS World University Rankings 2026
55
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#206
QS World University Rankings 2026
#198
QS World University Rankings 2025
55
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 73.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #121
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 71.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #142
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 39.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #511
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 26.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #620
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 22.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #683
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 29.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #594
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 35.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #543
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 92.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #135
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 52.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #322
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 72.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #281
About Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Research news reveals a university working across very different kinds of evidence
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid presents public research stories that range across science, language, culture, and new technologies. Recent examples include research connected with the acoustics of an endangered bird, questions in Spanish and Portuguese, square moiré graphene, and visual approaches to particle mass. These stories make a useful point about the university's research environment: the same institution can contain work based on sound, language, materials, mathematical or physical representation, and cultural analysis. The stories do not form one research programme. They are better read as illustrations of how different questions call for different materials, methods, and specialist settings.
A bird-acoustics question may require recordings, ecological context, and ways of analysing sound. A language question may depend on texts, speakers, grammatical patterns, or historical sources. Graphene research may involve material properties and physical measurement, while particle-mass visualisation raises questions about models, representation, and scientific communication. These differences matter when comparing a research setting. A broad phrase such as science or innovation hides the work that actually needs to be done. A more reliable approach names the research object, then looks for the institute, group, laboratory, or service where the relevant evidence and methods are described.
Research and creation are supported through local units and shared resources
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid's research area presents a structure that includes research centres, institutes, groups, projects, scientific and technical services, science communication, and links with organisations such as CSIC and the National Centre for Biotechnology. This layout distinguishes the places where questions are developed from the shared services and partnerships that may support them. A laboratory or group can explain a topic in depth. A scientific service may make an instrument or procedure possible. A centre can bring together researchers around a field. A partnership can connect work with an external research organisation. Each layer should be used for the evidence it provides, not as a substitute for the others.
The site also makes research ethics and researcher development visible. These pages are important context for responsible academic work, especially when research involves data, living systems, technical tools, or wider social consequences. They do not establish the content of an individual project. The strongest profile combines the two levels: locate the group that owns the research question, then identify the support, ethics, technical service, or partnership that appears directly relevant. This gives a reader a practical view of how research can be organised without extending a central administrative description to every local unit.
Turn a UAM topic into a clear research question and local source check
A useful Universidad Autónoma de Madrid research note starts with a question that is narrow enough to investigate. It could involve a species and its environment, a linguistic feature, a material, a physical model, a social issue, a historical source, or a technical process. Next, identify the smallest relevant group, centre, institute, or project. State which evidence matters: recordings, texts, samples, measurements, images, computational results, interviews, or documents. The university's public news can help generate a precise line of inquiry, but the local research setting is where the question and method should be verified.
Keep the record honest about uncertainty. A news story can show a recent result while leaving the broader project or future work unspecified. A research centre may match a subject without confirming the exact researcher connection. A shared scientific service can be relevant without showing that it is used by the group in question. These are normal limits of public information. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid provides visible routes through research stories, centres, groups, technical services, and ethical guidance. Following those routes carefully helps a reader build a specific research picture instead of a broad statement about institutional activity.
Institution record
- Country
- Spain
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.