Universitat de Valencia
#430
QS World University Rankings 2026
35.7
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#430
QS World University Rankings 2026
#445
QS World University Rankings 2025
35.7
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 49.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #227
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 17.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 17.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 31
- QS 2026 rank
- #575
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 2.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 39.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #497
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 44.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #465
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 91.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #151
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 16.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #797
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 74.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #255
About Universitat de Valencia
Five centuries of Universitat de València history sit beside a modern research structure
The public history of Universitat de València reaches back more than five centuries. Its historical page describes the 1499 constitutions for the Estudi General, the papal authorisation in 1501, and the royal privilege granted in 1502. This long record is useful orientation, particularly because the page also describes the university's development alongside the city of Valencia. It cannot establish a present-day research claim on its own. Historical continuity explains institutional context; it does not identify the present work of a department, research group, or individual scholar.
The same history page presents a wide academic range, including basic and experimental sciences, health sciences, education, humanities, social sciences, economics, and law. Its research and transfer material adds a second layer: research structures, research groups, scientific production, a research commission, staff support, international activity, collaboration, and transfer routes are listed separately. Those labels matter because they describe different kinds of public record. A department supplies a disciplinary home. A research group may name a closer setting. An output may document a specific result. A management route explains process rather than proving the content of a study.
A department list separates astronomy, law, computing, health, and environmental questions
Universitat de València's department directory gives a detailed starting point for separating questions that can sound similar at first. It lists departments in astronomy and astrophysics, mathematics, physics, chemistry, computer science, electronic engineering, chemical engineering, genetics, microbiology and ecology, medicine, pharmacology, geography, law, economics, sociology and social anthropology, among many others. The directory does not say that each department shares a method or a current project. It does show that a question about climate, health, data, materials, trade, public institutions, language, or social life should not be assigned to one broad label without closer checking.
For example, an environmental question can lead toward ecology, geography, chemistry, physics, law, economics, or public administration depending on its object. A health question may sit near medicine, physiology, pharmacology, microbiology, psychology, data analysis, or social policy. A digital question could involve computer science, electronic engineering, statistics, law, communication, or organisational research. The directory is valuable because it makes these distinctions visible. It is not enough evidence to describe a laboratory technique, a current dataset, or a named person's work. Those claims require a page closer to the actual research activity.
At Valencia, the next source depends on the evidence a question needs
A focused Universitat de València search can begin by writing the research object in ordinary language. It may be a coastal change, a chemical process, a disease mechanism, an algorithm, a legal dispute, an economic behaviour, a cultural text, or a community practice. The second sentence should identify the evidence needed: samples, laboratory measurements, maps, images, software, datasets, documents, interviews, surveys, case files, or observations. This prevents a department directory from becoming a list of attractive names. It turns the directory into a route for finding the part of the university that is most likely to hold a useful public record.
The strength of the final description depends on the closest source. University history can support institutional context. The research service can support a statement about how research, transfer, and support routes are organised. The directory can support the existence of named departments. None of these pages alone confirms an active project, a facility, or a detailed method. When a local group, project, output, or researcher page connects the object to a setting, it offers a firmer basis for comparison. Until then, a broad departmental connection should be described as a lead, not as a conclusion.
Institution record
- Country
- Spain
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.