Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

SpainEurope

#392

QS World University Rankings 2026

38.2

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#392

QS World University Rankings 2026

#371

QS World University Rankings 2025

38.2

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
40.8
QS 2026 rank
#291

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
32.8
QS 2026 rank
#437

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
42.5
QS 2026 rank
#471

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
27
QS 2026 rank
#617

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
16.7
QS 2026 rank
#771

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
31
QS 2026 rank
#578

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
36.9
QS 2026 rank
#527

International research network

QS 2026 score
84
QS 2026 rank
#276

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
35.7
QS 2026 rank
#481

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
77
QS 2026 rank
#214
University profile

About Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya gives technical research a detailed group and centre structure

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya describes a research environment that includes more than 150 research groups, its own research institutes, affiliated or linked institutes, research centres, affiliated research entities, research networks, and research areas. This technical map becomes useful only once the question is defined clearly. Engineering, architecture, science, and technology topics can sound close while relying on very different evidence. A question about optics may involve instruments, image processing, materials, physical models, or medical use. A question about artificial intelligence can involve code, signals, language, design, data, or a real-world system. Before selecting a UPC group or centre, identify the concrete system or phenomenon and the measurement, model, sample, observation, or record needed to study it.

The UPC research page also makes open and citizen science, integrity in research, research staff, and research-and-development networks visible. These elements belong to the wider research setting rather than to a single technical subject. Open and citizen science can describe ways knowledge is shared or research is organised. Integrity guidance concerns responsible practice. A network can connect activity across units. None of these pages shows that a particular project has a specific dataset, device, or method. The closest group, institute, centre, or project description is needed to establish that level of detail.

UPC research news shows different paths through optics, health technology, and creative computing

Recent UPC public research material has highlighted an optical system created by the Centre for Sensors, Instruments and Systems Development for calibration work connected with a large telescope, a spin-off related to eye examinations, and an artificial-intelligence system that generated musical responses to piano sound. These examples point to distinct research objects: optical calibration, visual-health technology, and sound-responsive computation. They are useful because each suggests a different form of evidence. Optical research may require instruments, physical measurements, modelling, or images. A health-technology question can involve devices, clinical context, validation, and visual data. A music-and-AI question can involve audio signals, computational models, performance practice, and human interaction. No single headline proves the active scope of a whole centre, so local pages remain necessary.

The contrast also shows that technological work can have scientific, engineering, cultural, or health-related contexts without becoming the same research path. A reader looking at a proposed subject should write down the specific input, output, system, and evaluation needed. For a sensor project, that may mean a measured signal and instrument behaviour. For an optical problem, it may mean a physical property and calibration process. For a computational music question, it may mean sound data and an interactive performance setting. This detail makes it far easier to find the UPC unit whose public material actually matches the question.

UPC research groups, institutes, and centres make technical settings visible

A practical Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya research note starts with one bounded technical question. It might concern a sensing device, optical system, built structure, communication method, environmental measurement, digital model, material behaviour, transport system, health technology, or computational creative practice. The next part lists the evidence needed to investigate it: an instrument reading, experimental result, drawing, prototype, simulation, data stream, sample, image, code, field observation, or design record. After that, look for the UPC group, institute, research centre, or affiliated entity that publicly names the same object and approach. A technical label is only the beginning; the evidence gives the search its direction.

The final step is to verify the local account. The university's central research page provides a useful overview of the group-and-centre structure, but it cannot confirm all current activity within every unit. A current project page, group profile, news item, or researcher page can show the narrow subject more clearly. If the page does not identify the necessary method or material, say that it remains to be checked. This approach makes the UPC profile useful for technical exploration while avoiding unsupported claims about facilities, active projects, or individual research interests.

Institution record

Country
Spain
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.