University of Eastern Finland
#604
QS World University Rankings 2026
28.2
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#604
QS World University Rankings 2026
#535
QS World University Rankings 2025
28.2
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 18.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #649
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 10.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 45
- QS 2026 rank
- #435
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 35.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #520
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 39.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #507
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 12
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 17.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #797
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 84
- QS 2026 rank
- #275
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 5.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 71.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #297
About University of Eastern Finland
University of Eastern Finland aligns research around ageing, environmental change, borders, and learning
University of Eastern Finland presents four profile areas for its strategic research: ageing, lifestyles and health; environmental change and sustainable use of natural resources; cultural encounters, mobilities and borders; and diversifying learning and interaction. These areas are useful because they frame complex issues without reducing them to one discipline. A health question may concern biological processes, health services, behaviour, work, or living conditions. An environmental question can focus on forests, water, materials, climate, energy, pollution, or community practices. A borders question may involve movement, language, institutions, historical records, media, or lived experience. A learning question might concern a digital tool, classroom practice, work activity, interaction, or assessment.
A profile area is a starting frame rather than a research result. For example, a question about ageing needs a defined population, condition, service, practice, or time period. A question about a resource needs a material, ecosystem, process, or policy setting. A question about mobility needs a movement, border, place, record, or group. The University of Eastern Finland site makes these broader routes visible, while a research community or project record can identify the phenomenon and evidence more precisely. That move from theme to object is essential for an accurate research search.
UEF research communities show why an interdisciplinary question still needs a specific unit of analysis
The University of Eastern Finland lists research communities covering cardiovascular medicine, borders and cultural encounters, climate forcing and ecosystems, computational modelling and data science, drug discovery, social and health services, forests and bioeconomy, digitalised everyday life and work, metabolic diseases, cancer, musculoskeletal health, neuroscience, photonics, water, and resource society. This breadth makes a narrow unit of analysis even more important. A water question might concern a catchment, aquatic habitat, contaminant, governance decision, monitoring method, or use practice. A computational question may focus on a model, image, sensor, dataset, algorithm, or decision process. A forest question could examine a species, landscape, material flow, restoration practice, or policy condition.
The research-community names also show where different forms of evidence may meet. A cardiovascular question can combine biological measures with clinical information. A digital-society question may require platform data, interviews, observations, or workplace records. A resource-society question can involve minerals, energy systems, documents, markets, technical measurements, and public decisions. The correct combination depends on the actual research object. The presence of related communities does not establish that every individual question is being studied. A closer source should identify the project, group, output, or research activity that carries the claim.
At the University of Eastern Finland, identify the research community after defining the material under study
A useful University of Eastern Finland inquiry begins with material that can be observed or examined. It may be a patient pathway, a forest plot, a water sample, an image, a sensor stream, a policy document, a learning interaction, a tumour cell, a border crossing, or an energy practice. Next, state the setting and the evidence available: samples, maps, measurements, datasets, code, records, interviews, surveys, images, documents, observations, or models. This order is practical because it prevents a reader from choosing a community only on the basis of a familiar word such as health, climate, data, or sustainability.
UEF's public research material shows an interdisciplinary organisation, four profile areas, and named communities with distinct research concerns. It does not establish an exact match between every related topic and a particular unit, researcher, or method. A sound conclusion should rely on the closest public source that links the object, setting, and research activity together. When the information only points toward a neighbouring community, it remains a sensible direction for more checking. This evidence-led method helps readers use the University of Eastern Finland research map with precision and without making unsupported promises.
Institution record
- Country
- Finland
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.