Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Turku

FinlandEurope

#366

QS World University Rankings 2026

40.6

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#366

QS World University Rankings 2026

#375

QS World University Rankings 2025

40.6

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
36.3
QS 2026 rank
#334

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
20.2
QS 2026 rank
#651

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
63.2
QS 2026 rank
#279

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
39.6
QS 2026 rank
#476

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
46.2
QS 2026 rank
#462

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
8.9
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
14.7
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
89.2
QS 2026 rank
#184

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
46.1
QS 2026 rank
#378

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
74.4
QS 2026 rank
#250
University profile

About University of Turku

Multidisciplinary research is organised through themes and areas of strength

University of Turku describes itself as an active academic community that studies, teaches, and works toward a better future. Its research pages present the university as multidisciplinary and direct visitors toward research themes and areas of strength. This gives a useful starting point for someone whose question does not fit one simple subject label. A theme can indicate where related work is visible across the institution, but it does not identify the exact research setting. The next step is to find the faculty, researcher, project, or current research material that makes the subject, method, and scale of the work clear.

The public research pages connect themes with researcher careers, doctoral activity, public defences, journal articles, research environment, infrastructure, innovations, and research support. These are not interchangeable sources of evidence. A faculty or programme may establish the academic frame; a research article may show a question that has been investigated; a public defence may show a completed piece of work; and infrastructure may describe the practical conditions around research. Use each source for the question it can answer. This avoids treating a central page about multidisciplinary activity as proof of the current work of every group.

Open science and responsible research provide an institutional frame

University of Turku makes open science and research, research ethics, responsible assessment, research permits, and responsible research with impact visible from its central research area. These topics help explain the framework in which research is expected to operate. They can be especially useful when a question involves data, research participants, environmental materials, or a public audience. Still, institutional frameworks do not describe a specific research design. The appropriate local page should show how a group approaches evidence, ethics, data, or collaboration in the setting that matters for the topic you are exploring.

The university also points toward research infrastructures, the Turku University Library, a researcher search, research career information, and a Graduate School. These routes can help move from a broad theme to a practical research environment. For example, a researcher search may surface a relevant topic while an infrastructure page indicates whether a shared resource exists. Neither one alone is enough to define a match. Compare the language across the local research record, the unit description, and any visible project material. When they agree, the connection is clearer; when they differ, the difference deserves attention.

Create a Turku research record that can be updated

For University of Turku, begin with a single research question and then select the theme or area of strength that appears closest. Add one local anchor, such as a faculty, researcher, research group, project, infrastructure, or current article. Explain the connection by naming a research object, method, source of evidence, technical setting, or public issue. This creates a record that another person can inspect without relying on a general impression of multidisciplinary work. It can expose a question that is too broad and needs division into smaller, more testable parts.

Keep the last part of the record for uncertainty and date-sensitive details. A theme can remain stable while a project, group, or researcher focus changes. A central research page may show the available routes without revealing how one team is organised today. University of Turku provides useful links between themes, researchers, infrastructure, open science, ethics, and research environment. The strongest comparison uses those links as a path toward current local evidence and keeps only the claims that remain supported at the most specific level.

Institution record

Country
Finland
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.