Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

National Technical University of Athens

GreeceEurope

#355

QS World University Rankings 2026

41.2

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#355

QS World University Rankings 2026

#321

QS World University Rankings 2025

41.2

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
28.2
QS 2026 rank
#448

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
51.2
QS 2026 rank
#244

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
5.9
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
80.9
QS 2026 rank
#153

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
9.6
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
14.9
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
72
QS 2026 rank
#499

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
51.4
QS 2026 rank
#331

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
49.3
QS 2026 rank
#725
University profile

About National Technical University of Athens

National Technical University of Athens organizes technical research through schools and laboratories

National Technical University of Athens presents a technical academic structure made up of schools in civil engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical and computer engineering, architecture, chemical engineering, rural, surveying and geoinformatics engineering, mining and metallurgical engineering, naval architecture and marine engineering, and applied mathematical and physical sciences. That list is helpful because it separates engineering questions that can sound similar at first. A question about an urban system may involve civil engineering, architecture, geoinformatics, materials, energy, or public infrastructure. A question about a device may sit between electrical and computer engineering, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics. The school map offers an initial way to locate a subject, but it does not specify which local group, experimental setting, model, or current line of work is relevant.

The university's research material states that scientific research is carried out in 130 officially established laboratories under academic supervision. A laboratory count should be read as an institutional fact, not as proof that every topic has a suitable setting. The important next question is narrower: what kind of evidence does the topic require? It may need a structural model, field measurement, chemical analysis, geospatial data, a physical experiment, a computational system, a material sample, a design study, or an engineering prototype. Once the required evidence is visible, it becomes possible to search within the appropriate NTUA school and laboratory pages for a specific connection rather than relying on a large university-wide description.

NTUA research support and laboratory structure describe different layers of work

The NTUA research page distinguishes laboratories from the Senate Committee on Basic Research, the Research Committee, and the Special Account for Research Grants. The Senate committee is described as supporting basic research in science and technology fields pursued at the institution. The Research Committee has administrative functions related to research programmes, including programme management, information and support, and progress monitoring. These are different layers of an academic environment. A laboratory can be where research activity has a local technical setting. A committee can describe how research is organised or supported at the institutional level. Neither should be used as a substitute for a current laboratory, school, or project page that names the scientific problem itself.

The research overview also refers to work involving public bodies, European institutions, and private-sector organisations under academic conditions. This can be useful context for a question with an external or applied dimension, such as infrastructure, environmental systems, materials, transport, energy, digital communication, or industrial processes. It does not show that a particular external relationship applies to a given research interest. A solid NTUA comparison separates the institutional route from the substantive route. The institutional route describes the research environment. The substantive route identifies the technical object, the measurement or model, and the local unit that publicly describes that work.

Build an NTUA research comparison around a defined engineering problem

For National Technical University of Athens, begin with a question that can be stated without a broad discipline label. It might concern how a structure responds to a condition, how a material behaves, how an energy or communication system operates, how a land or marine space is measured, how a chemical process changes, or how a physical model explains a phenomenon. Then state what would count as relevant evidence: simulation, sensor data, laboratory testing, drawings, field observations, maps, datasets, samples, or a prototype. This description can guide the search toward the school and laboratory whose public language matches the research object. It is stronger than saying only that the university offers an engineering subject.

Conclude with a current check at the relevant local unit. A school page can confirm a disciplinary home, while a laboratory page, project description, or researcher record can show whether the specific object and approach are visible. A central research page may reveal university-wide support, but it does not settle questions about equipment, data, active work, or individual supervision. Keep the profile honest by writing down what the local source actually names and what remains unconfirmed. That method respects the breadth of NTUA's technical structure while making the comparison useful for a focused research question.

Institution record

Country
Greece
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.