Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Szeged

HungaryEurope

#597

QS World University Rankings 2026

28.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#597

QS World University Rankings 2026

#570

QS World University Rankings 2025

28.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
26.2
QS 2026 rank
#484

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
22.7
QS 2026 rank
#583

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
41.9
QS 2026 rank
#482

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
8.9
QS 2026 rank
#801

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
15.4
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
56.4
QS 2026 rank
#368

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
60.6
QS 2026 rank
#336

International research network

QS 2026 score
75.3
QS 2026 rank
#438

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
29
QS 2026 rank
#574

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
69.4
QS 2026 rank
#323
University profile

About University of Szeged

The University of Szeged brings twelve faculties into one research university

The University of Szeged's official English pages describe twelve faculties covering law, medicine, dentistry, arts, health sciences and social studies, engineering, pharmacy, economics and business administration, agriculture, teacher training, music, and science and informatics. The university also refers to doctoral schools, a teacher-training centre, research groups, and international study options. This broad academic map helps a reader locate a field, but the faculty, programme, and doctoral-school pages still determine the route for a specific question.

The university's public research material spans basic and applied work. It highlights the Baja Astronomical Observatory, the Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, science and informatics, health, and international collaboration through the European University Alliance for Global Health. These settings use different evidence and methods. An astronomy project, a clinical study, and a social-science question should not be compared through one university-wide label.

Science, health, and informatics show active research pathways

The Faculty of Science and Informatics describes institutes and departments that support teaching and research in science and computing. Its public pages mention a new master's programme in artificial intelligence beginning in September two thousand twenty-six and an English-language astronomy and astrophysics route. The Institute of Informatics publishes Acta Cybernetica and links research activity with doctoral training. These references show how a field can connect a programme, an institute, and a publication platform while keeping their roles distinct.

The clinical and health pages add another layer through paediatrics, public health, health sciences, and cross-border healthcare development. Other public material refers to research talent, chemistry, physical chemistry, and innovative toxicity testing. These items identify active themes, not universal promises. An applicant should trace the topic to the department, laboratory, clinical centre, or doctoral school that owns the work.

A focused way to assess a Szeged study or research option

Start with the question and identify whether the work is laboratory-based, computational, clinical, field-based, textual, or policy-oriented. Use the twelve-faculty map to compare the degree route with the department or research group that actually studies the question. If English-language study matters, check the individual programme rather than assuming that every course uses the same language. For doctoral work, read the doctoral-school description with the supervisor and department information.

The data panel provides institutional background about the University of Szeged and does not review one course, laboratory, supervisor, or doctoral project. For your shortlist, record the exact programme, responsible faculty or academic unit, research question, method, language setting, and the current Szeged page carrying route information. Keep a new programme announcement separate from evidence about an individual research group. Add the observatory, clinical centre, informatics institute, or alliance connection only when it supports the proposed work. This creates a clearer record for comparing science, health, humanities, or doctoral options. The twelve-faculty structure is most useful when it narrows a search to the unit that teaches or supervises the work, rather than standing in for that unit's evidence. A doctoral applicant should also record the relevant school, supervisor, and research environment separately, because those details shape the actual project. A clear note can also distinguish a taught module, a laboratory placement, a clinical setting, and a doctoral research commitment before the application is compared.

Institution record

Country
Hungary
Region
Europe
Status
Private not for Profit
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.