Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB)
#255
QS World University Rankings 2026
49.9
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#255
QS World University Rankings 2026
#256
QS World University Rankings 2025
49.9
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 58.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #181
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 85.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #90
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 54.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #345
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 5.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 94.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #182
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 13.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 39.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 68.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #224
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 59.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #516
About Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB)
A technical university with several disciplinary routes
Bandung Institute of Technology, known as ITB, describes a structure that includes faculties and schools in earth sciences and technology, mathematics and natural sciences, industrial technology, mechanical and aerospace engineering, mining and petroleum engineering, civil and environmental engineering, life sciences and technology, electrical engineering and informatics, pharmacy, architecture, planning and policy development, business and management, and art and design. For a STEM researcher, the list is useful because related questions can have distinct academic homes. A materials problem, for example, may be approached through a science, engineering, or earth-science setting depending on the methods and applications involved.
ITB also identifies a Graduate School of Multidisciplinary Science and Technology. This signals a route for work that does not sit neatly in one faculty, but it should not be taken as evidence that every cross-field interest is already organised as a single programme. Start with the department or faculty that owns the key subject knowledge, then look for the research group, centre, or project that gives the question its practical form. This approach turns a long faculty list into a useful map instead of a collection of possible names.
Research centres and groups as evidence of activity
ITB's research pages distinguish centres, research centres, centres of excellence in science and technology, and research groups. The university explains that research groups bring faculty together around particular interests and direct readers to a research portal for projects, groups, and researchers. These resources can be used in a sequence. A centre may show an area where several disciplines meet. A research group can reveal the narrower questions within that area. A project or researcher profile can then help you see whether the work is current and related to your own preparation.
The research site also displays activity across science, technology, art, and humanities, including work linked with food security, digital volcanology, clinical practice, and economic questions. Those examples are not a complete catalogue of ITB's work, but they show why a technical topic may have an environmental, health, social, or design connection. Do not assume that a broad issue belongs to one unit just because it appears in a news item. Use recent pages to find the researchers and organisational setting behind the work before adding it to a serious research comparison.
Making an ITB shortlist entry that stays specific
Begin with a defined research problem and locate the faculty or school that supplies its main discipline. Next, identify one or two groups, centres, or researchers whose public work addresses a related question. Write down the observable link, such as a method, system, material, field setting, or analytical problem. This makes it easier to tell whether your interest is genuinely connected to the work. If a relationship only exists at the level of an area like engineering or sustainability, it is still too broad to guide a careful choice.
The university-wide pages explain how ITB arranges faculties, graduate study, centres, and research groups. The final evidence should come from material closest to the academic home you have identified. Numbers presented elsewhere on this page describe the institution at a broad level; they do not measure the suitability of a particular research route. Keep your notes current, use the local terminology of the relevant unit, and leave unanswered questions clearly marked rather than turning them into assumptions.
Institution record
- Country
- Indonesia
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.