Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

IsraelAsia

#240

QS World University Rankings 2026

51.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#240

QS World University Rankings 2026

#281

QS World University Rankings 2025

51.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
42.9
QS 2026 rank
#276

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
36.4
QS 2026 rank
#394

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
74.6
QS 2026 rank
#201

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
41.9
QS 2026 rank
#452

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
81.9
QS 2026 rank
#279

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
33.5
QS 2026 rank
#551

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
38.8
QS 2026 rank
#509

International research network

QS 2026 score
74.2
QS 2026 rank
#460

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
97.1
QS 2026 rank
#57

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
65.5
QS 2026 rank
#387
University profile

About Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Research settings at Hebrew University extend across several academic areas

Hebrew University presents its research activity through centres, laboratories, core facilities, libraries, research services, and topic pages rather than through one single route. Its international overview names study and research across exact sciences, medicine, agriculture, humanities, social sciences, law, and other areas. That breadth is useful only after a topic has been made precise. A question about a biological system, public health, crop production, a historical record, a social institution, or a computational method will need a different academic setting and a different form of evidence. The institution-wide map is a way to begin locating that setting, but it cannot confirm a particular project or person.

The research page also places research centres beside laboratories, facilities, collaborations, and an Authority for Research and Development. These labels describe different parts of an academic environment. A centre can point to a sustained theme or community. A laboratory can indicate experimental work. A core facility may show a shared technical resource. A research service can explain the organisational framework around a project. Reading those roles separately makes a clearer first picture of Hebrew University. It also prevents a broad list of disciplines from becoming an unsupported assumption about the methods, data, or people involved in one particular line of inquiry.

Facilities, research support, and translation should be read as distinct layers

Hebrew University identifies research core facilities, libraries and databases, ethics, laboratory infrastructure, researcher portals, and support for doctoral and postdoctoral researchers. These are practical layers around research, but they do not all answer the same question. A library or database route may matter when a project depends on literature, archives, or structured information. A core facility may matter when the work needs a specialised instrument or shared technical process. An ethics route may become relevant when the study involves people, biological material, or other sensitive work. The research question still comes first, because it determines which of these layers needs closer attention.

The university also lists Yissum, its technology-transfer company, alongside research centres and collaborations. That connection can provide context when an inquiry concerns a method, device, or research outcome that might move beyond an academic setting. It cannot establish that every laboratory has a commercial route or that any specific idea has reached that stage. A focused note can keep the layers in order: identify the scholarly problem, find the nearest group or research setting, then consider facilities, research support, or transfer only where the public material makes their relevance visible.

Centres, core facilities, and research support shape Hebrew University research routes

A useful Hebrew University record begins with an object of study rather than with a general subject label. The object might be a cell process, an environmental sample, a crop system, a text collection, a legal question, a population pattern, or an algorithmic model. Next, describe the evidence that would be needed: measurements, samples, records, interviews, images, field observations, documents, or a dataset. The university's public research routes can then help locate a likely centre, laboratory, facility, or academic area. This sequence gives the reader a way to test a connection instead of relying on the fact that a large university has many disciplines.

The final check needs to be narrow. A centre title may show that a topic has an institutional home while leaving the current project unclear. A facility can describe a technical possibility without confirming access or use. A collaboration can signal a relationship without explaining its role in a proposed study. Hebrew University provides a broad set of visible research routes across scientific, professional, social, and humanistic work. The strongest reading follows one defined question into one named setting, records the kind of evidence involved, and leaves any point that is not shown by the public material open for a further official check.

Institution record

Country
Israel
Region
Asia
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.