Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Chung-Ang University

Republic of Korea Private not for Profit

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#479
Up 10 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#489
Overall score
33.3
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Chung-Ang University

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 24.9

#512 worldwide

Employer reputation 37.6

#372 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 79.2

#172 worldwide

Citations per faculty 16.7

#769 worldwide

International faculty ratio 19.7

#719 worldwide

International student ratio 62.4

#323 worldwide

International student diversity 66.1

#297 worldwide

International research network 31.3

#801 worldwide

Employment outcomes 17.3

#777 worldwide

Sustainability 68.9

#331 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Large
About 12,000 to 30,000 students
Subject range
Focused
Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Asia
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Chung-Ang University

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Chung-Ang University's school map keeps engineering, health, humanities, and arts in their own settings

Chung-Ang University presents a broad academic map that includes humanities, social sciences, education, natural sciences, biotechnology, engineering, ICT engineering, software, business and economics, medicine, pharmacy, nursing, art, art and technology, sport sciences, and virtual convergence. These labels are useful for locating a possible school-level setting, but they should not be treated as a claim that every topic is addressed in every part of the university. A question about a sensor, a medical condition, a software system, a design practice, or a social institution needs a closer record that identifies the actual subject and context.

The home-page research links reinforce that distinction. They point to work on a Tesla-turbine-inspired structure, AI approaches to non-destructive testing, carbon-dot nanohybrids for cancer theranostics, and microfluidic systems for sweat analysis. The examples cover mechanical energy, inspection technology, nanomaterials, cancer-related questions, and chemical sensing. They should not be compressed into a general statement that Chung-Ang University has one approach to innovation. Each topic brings different materials, instruments, analytical choices, and limits of interpretation.

A portable precast-monitoring study offers one concrete Chung-Ang research trail

One official research-achievement article describes a portable sensing system for monitoring precast concrete structures during delivery. The report says that the system uses IoT sensors to measure strain and acceleration while a structure is transported. It frames the problem around vibrations, lifting, imbalanced loads, and damage that may not be immediately visible. The researchers tested the system during delivery of a precast concrete beam and assessed acceleration, tilt, and strain. This is a specific engineering record, not a description of all research at the university or even of all civil and environmental engineering work.

The article is useful because it links a clearly defined object to an observable evidence trail. The object is a delivered precast structure. The evidence includes sensor readings, deformation, acceleration, tilt, and a safety assessment. A reader considering a related construction question can use those terms to locate the nearest local research page. A different question about medicine, computer systems, media, law, or arts practice would need its own route and its own evidence. The value of the report lies in its specificity, not in expanding it into a broad institutional promise.

At CAU, the right research route changes with the object being investigated

A careful Chung-Ang University profile begins by separating the subject from the university name. A structural-monitoring question may require sensor logs, material behaviour, movement data, and engineering assessment. A sweat-analysis question may need microfluidic design, chemical reagents, biological measurements, and validation. A cancer-theranostics question may involve nanomaterials, cellular context, images, and clinical relevance. A media or humanities question may need texts, cultural artefacts, interviews, records, or interpretation. This approach helps a reader move from the school map to the kind of public record that can genuinely illuminate the chosen problem.

CAU's official pages establish multiple school-level routes and several documented research examples. They cannot settle the scope of any later project or whether a particular device or person is involved. A profile is strongest when it says exactly what the public page makes visible and leaves the rest open for a closer check. When a local unit, researcher, output, or project page names the object and setting together, it gives a defensible basis for a focused connection. Until then, a school title or headline is useful orientation rather than a verified research match.