AGH University of Krakow
#801
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#801
QS World University Rankings 2026
#851
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 13.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 30.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #465
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 54.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #344
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 12.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 4.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 7.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 12.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 75.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #430
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 47.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #776
About AGH University of Krakow
AGH University of Krakow uses research infrastructure to make technical questions more specific
AGH University of Krakow makes its research offer, faculties, doctoral school, scientific discipline councils, and university structure visible alongside one another. Its research offer is described as an online database of infrastructure and capabilities. That is valuable when a question depends on something more precise than a subject title. A material question may require an instrument, a measurement protocol, and a condition under which the material is tested. A software question may need a system, a dataset, a processing task, and a way to assess results. A problem related to energy or the environment can involve a physical process, a technical design, a location, or a pattern of use. Infrastructure matters only when it is connected to a stated observation.
The university's research pages encourage that connection between an object and a capability. A researcher can ask what must be measured, constructed, simulated, or compared before considering which facility or group is relevant. A question about a sensor is different from one about a production process, even when both are described as engineering. A question about a mineral, an ecosystem, or a chemical reaction may need another scale of observation altogether. AGH's research offer therefore works best as a route from a well-defined problem toward an appropriate technical setting, rather than as a catalogue of equipment separated from the reason it would be used.
Space, computing, materials, and energy work at AGH begin from sharply different objects
The public pages show activity that ranges from protein research connected with questions about life beyond Earth to scientific computing, solar-boat work, digital systems, software engineering, and space-resources discussion. These subjects all have a technical dimension, but they require different material. A protein question may involve molecular structure, experimental conditions, or a biological process. A computing question can focus on code, a model, data, performance, or the assumptions built into an algorithm. A solar-boat project may require a design, energy source, movement through water, and measured performance. A space-resources question can involve materials, environments, logistics, or regulation.
For an AGH enquiry, the useful first sentence names the system and the uncertainty. It might ask how a component performs under a defined condition, how a data method changes an inference, how a biological mechanism is observed, or how a technical constraint shapes a design. The next sentence should say what will be compared or measured. This avoids turning a collection of contemporary topics into one vague idea of technology. It also makes it easier to see whether a question needs work in materials, computation, life science, energy, or a deliberately designed connection between those areas.
AGH cooperation and science meetings connect research work with public and professional settings
AGH describes cooperation with industry, business, administration, associations, consortia, and universities in several countries. Its research pages also present science meetings that use lectures and question-and-answer sessions to share research results in clear language. These settings point to different stages of a technical question. A partnership can clarify a real constraint, a setting in which a system operates, or a problem that cannot be understood from laboratory data alone. A public discussion can reveal what needs to be explained, what language is unclear, and what consequence of a result matters outside a specialist group.
A careful research plan does not assume that cooperation automatically makes a project useful. It still needs a phenomenon, a method, and a clear boundary. A technical project may compare two designs, observe a process over time, test a material, or examine data from a defined system. A public or professional context can then help explain why that comparison matters and what conditions the interpretation must respect. At AGH, the infrastructure database, research cooperation routes, and science meetings become complementary: one helps identify capabilities, one connects work to a setting, and one helps make a result understandable without flattening the detail behind it.
Institution record
- Country
- Poland
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.