Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

AGH University of Krakow

PolandEurope

#801

QS World University Rankings 2026

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#801

QS World University Rankings 2026

#851

QS World University Rankings 2025

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
13.1
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
30.6
QS 2026 rank
#465

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
54.7
QS 2026 rank
#344

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
12.7
QS 2026 rank
#801

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
4.4
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
7.3
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
12.1
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
75.6
QS 2026 rank
#430

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
4
QS 2026 rank
#801

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
47.4
QS 2026 rank
#776
University profile

About AGH University of Krakow

AGH University of Krakow uses research infrastructure to make technical questions more specific

AGH University of Krakow makes its research offer, faculties, doctoral school, scientific discipline councils, and university structure visible alongside one another. Its research offer is described as an online database of infrastructure and capabilities. That is valuable when a question depends on something more precise than a subject title. A material question may require an instrument, a measurement protocol, and a condition under which the material is tested. A software question may need a system, a dataset, a processing task, and a way to assess results. A problem related to energy or the environment can involve a physical process, a technical design, a location, or a pattern of use. Infrastructure matters only when it is connected to a stated observation.

The university's research pages encourage that connection between an object and a capability. A researcher can ask what must be measured, constructed, simulated, or compared before considering which facility or group is relevant. A question about a sensor is different from one about a production process, even when both are described as engineering. A question about a mineral, an ecosystem, or a chemical reaction may need another scale of observation altogether. AGH's research offer therefore works best as a route from a well-defined problem toward an appropriate technical setting, rather than as a catalogue of equipment separated from the reason it would be used.

Space, computing, materials, and energy work at AGH begin from sharply different objects

The public pages show activity that ranges from protein research connected with questions about life beyond Earth to scientific computing, solar-boat work, digital systems, software engineering, and space-resources discussion. These subjects all have a technical dimension, but they require different material. A protein question may involve molecular structure, experimental conditions, or a biological process. A computing question can focus on code, a model, data, performance, or the assumptions built into an algorithm. A solar-boat project may require a design, energy source, movement through water, and measured performance. A space-resources question can involve materials, environments, logistics, or regulation.

For an AGH enquiry, the useful first sentence names the system and the uncertainty. It might ask how a component performs under a defined condition, how a data method changes an inference, how a biological mechanism is observed, or how a technical constraint shapes a design. The next sentence should say what will be compared or measured. This avoids turning a collection of contemporary topics into one vague idea of technology. It also makes it easier to see whether a question needs work in materials, computation, life science, energy, or a deliberately designed connection between those areas.

AGH cooperation and science meetings connect research work with public and professional settings

AGH describes cooperation with industry, business, administration, associations, consortia, and universities in several countries. Its research pages also present science meetings that use lectures and question-and-answer sessions to share research results in clear language. These settings point to different stages of a technical question. A partnership can clarify a real constraint, a setting in which a system operates, or a problem that cannot be understood from laboratory data alone. A public discussion can reveal what needs to be explained, what language is unclear, and what consequence of a result matters outside a specialist group.

A careful research plan does not assume that cooperation automatically makes a project useful. It still needs a phenomenon, a method, and a clear boundary. A technical project may compare two designs, observe a process over time, test a material, or examine data from a defined system. A public or professional context can then help explain why that comparison matters and what conditions the interpretation must respect. At AGH, the infrastructure database, research cooperation routes, and science meetings become complementary: one helps identify capabilities, one connects work to a setting, and one helps make a result understandable without flattening the detail behind it.

Institution record

Country
Poland
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.