Jagiellonian University
#303
QS World University Rankings 2026
45.1
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#303
QS World University Rankings 2026
#312
QS World University Rankings 2025
45.1
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 49.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #226
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 54.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #224
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 75.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #193
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 10.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 30
- QS 2026 rank
- #591
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 35.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #536
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 88.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #198
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 61.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #256
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 71.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #296
About Jagiellonian University
Jagiellonian University gives research several distinct starting points
Jagiellonian University places faculties and other units, doctoral schools, research centres, cooperation routes, and institutional news in the same public map. Its research route specifically points to the Małopolska Centre of Biotechnology, the Jagiellonian Center of Innovation, the Jagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics, the SOLARIS synchrotron, the Research Support Centre, and the Centre for Brain Research. Taken together, these JU labels distinguish subject-focused centres, shared facilities, and support roles. A centre may be defined by a subject area, an instrument, a shared research service, or a more focused scientific question. A reader should not assume that two nearby entries use the same methods simply because they appear on one university page. Instead, use the institutional map to find the relevant setting, then move to the local material that identifies the researchers, topic, and evidence in use.
JU research news shows work ranging from brain imaging to space measurement
Current Jagiellonian University material offers examples from several research environments. One item describes work on changes in the visual cortex of people blind from birth using modern imaging techniques. Another follows a consortium connected with physics, astronomy, and applied computer science as it develops and tests a compact quantum magnetometer for measuring Earth's magnetic field from orbit. Other visible items refer to whole-genome sequencing initiatives, research on coronavirus infection, and a remote communication system that uses three-dimensional modelling and augmented reality. These examples show a range of research objects and tools, but they remain examples. A public news entry is not proof that an entire centre, faculty, or university is organised around the same project. The strongest next check is the page for the responsible unit, where the question and local research practice can be understood in context.
Jagiellonian research routes need a unit-level reading
A productive Jagiellonian University comparison starts by pinning one question to a visible research object. It may concern neural reorganisation, a biological mechanism, a medical technology, a magnetic measurement, a genomic dataset, or another clearly bounded problem. Search first for the named JU centre, laboratory, faculty, or school most directly connected with that object. Then make a short record of the practice described there. Imaging, experimental testing, computational analysis, clinical material, engineering design, field data, and collaborative consortium work are not interchangeable forms of research. Knowing which one is visible makes the comparison more precise and avoids turning a central institutional name into a claim about a particular method.
Jagiellonian University also connects its research pages with doctoral schools, technology-transfer routes, cooperation material, and research support. These routes can be useful for understanding the wider structure around a research area, but they should stay separate from the academic evidence for a particular group. A technology or support page may explain institutional activity without showing the substantive work of a research team. Keep the profile focused on the unit that describes the question itself. Where the information is too broad, record the gap rather than filling it with assumptions. At JU, writing the date beside a local observation also distinguishes a continuing research line from a past announcement. That approach turns JU's wide public map into a practical research trail that can be checked and updated.
Institution record
- Country
- Poland
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.