Universidade Nova de Lisboa
#327
QS World University Rankings 2026
42.8
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#327
QS World University Rankings 2026
#388
QS World University Rankings 2025
42.8
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 40.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #301
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 42.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #315
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 18.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 37.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #498
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 27.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #620
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 77.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #236
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 79.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #207
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 84.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #273
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 59.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #275
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 66.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #363
About Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Universidade Nova de Lisboa makes research units, people, outputs, and data discoverable together
Universidade Nova de Lisboa presents its research through a public portal where visitors can search research units, researcher profiles, concepts, free text, research output, datasets, activities, and collaboration information. That structure can turn an early idea into a traceable research search. A broad topic can first be expressed in ordinary language, then checked against the terms used by a unit or researcher. Output, dataset, and profile records serve different purposes. None by itself demonstrates a current project, a shared method, or a personal fit, so the most reliable view comes from comparing several current local records.
The portal also describes content from NOVA's research-information system and invites users to explore research expertise and collaboration networks. This does not mean that a network visualisation proves an active joint project. It is best treated as a route for discovery. If a question concerns a molecular process, urban issue, economic decision, legal rule, cultural source, data method, education practice, or public-health problem, begin with the object rather than the name of a field. Then look for a NOVA unit or profile that gives the object a more precise language. The detail that matters most is what the closest page actually identifies as its research subject or output.
NOVA links public research records with sustainability themes without reducing work to one label
Universidade Nova de Lisboa's research portal groups visible records around the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including health, education, equality, water, energy, work, industry and infrastructure, inequalities, cities, responsible consumption, climate action, life below water, life on land, peace and institutions, and partnerships. These headings can help a reader frame the public significance of a question. They do not define a discipline or method. A water topic might involve chemistry, engineering, policy, health, geography, data, or community practice. A city topic could involve architecture, transport, law, economics, history, or social organisation. Treat the goal as context, then use research-unit and researcher material to identify the actual evidence and approach.
The organisation profile also makes research and development units, output types, datasets, and activities visible. Those categories are helpful because they prevent a comparison from relying only on a polished institutional statement. A dataset is not the same thing as a paper. A public talk is not the same thing as a research project. A research unit is not necessarily a small group working on one question. When building a private note, distinguish the research object from the route used to find it. Write down the unit or profile, the clearly stated topic, and the type of record that supports the connection. That gives the result a basis that can be checked later rather than a claim assembled from broad themes.
A NOVA research search becomes stronger when it follows a visible chain of evidence
For Universidade Nova de Lisboa, start with a compact question that names both a phenomenon and a setting. It might concern a health outcome, a local environmental condition, a technological practice, a legal or economic relationship, a historical source, or a social process. Then specify what kind of material could answer it: laboratory observations, surveys, interview records, published texts, sensor data, maps, images, administrative records, code, or a dataset. Search the portal for those terms, taking note of the unit or researcher whose description is closest. This sequence avoids matching solely on a generic word that happens to appear across several unrelated areas.
The final step is to keep the conclusion modest. The public portal can show an active research landscape, but it cannot settle questions about present supervision, access to a given dataset, a laboratory's equipment, or a person's current availability. A local profile or unit page may clarify part of that picture. If it does, use only the specific detail it contains. If it does not, leave the remaining point for later verification. This is how NOVA's searchable research record can support a careful comparison without turning broad visibility into an unsupported promise.
Institution record
- Country
- Portugal
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.