Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Universidade Nova de Lisboa

PortugalEurope

#327

QS World University Rankings 2026

42.8

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#327

QS World University Rankings 2026

#388

QS World University Rankings 2025

42.8

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
40.1
QS 2026 rank
#301

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
42.6
QS 2026 rank
#315

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
18.1
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
37.6
QS 2026 rank
#498

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
27.2
QS 2026 rank
#620

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
77.7
QS 2026 rank
#236

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
79.8
QS 2026 rank
#207

International research network

QS 2026 score
84.1
QS 2026 rank
#273

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
59.4
QS 2026 rank
#275

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
66.9
QS 2026 rank
#363
University profile

About Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Universidade Nova de Lisboa makes research units, people, outputs, and data discoverable together

Universidade Nova de Lisboa presents its research through a public portal where visitors can search research units, researcher profiles, concepts, free text, research output, datasets, activities, and collaboration information. That structure can turn an early idea into a traceable research search. A broad topic can first be expressed in ordinary language, then checked against the terms used by a unit or researcher. Output, dataset, and profile records serve different purposes. None by itself demonstrates a current project, a shared method, or a personal fit, so the most reliable view comes from comparing several current local records.

The portal also describes content from NOVA's research-information system and invites users to explore research expertise and collaboration networks. This does not mean that a network visualisation proves an active joint project. It is best treated as a route for discovery. If a question concerns a molecular process, urban issue, economic decision, legal rule, cultural source, data method, education practice, or public-health problem, begin with the object rather than the name of a field. Then look for a NOVA unit or profile that gives the object a more precise language. The detail that matters most is what the closest page actually identifies as its research subject or output.

NOVA links public research records with sustainability themes without reducing work to one label

Universidade Nova de Lisboa's research portal groups visible records around the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including health, education, equality, water, energy, work, industry and infrastructure, inequalities, cities, responsible consumption, climate action, life below water, life on land, peace and institutions, and partnerships. These headings can help a reader frame the public significance of a question. They do not define a discipline or method. A water topic might involve chemistry, engineering, policy, health, geography, data, or community practice. A city topic could involve architecture, transport, law, economics, history, or social organisation. Treat the goal as context, then use research-unit and researcher material to identify the actual evidence and approach.

The organisation profile also makes research and development units, output types, datasets, and activities visible. Those categories are helpful because they prevent a comparison from relying only on a polished institutional statement. A dataset is not the same thing as a paper. A public talk is not the same thing as a research project. A research unit is not necessarily a small group working on one question. When building a private note, distinguish the research object from the route used to find it. Write down the unit or profile, the clearly stated topic, and the type of record that supports the connection. That gives the result a basis that can be checked later rather than a claim assembled from broad themes.

A NOVA research search becomes stronger when it follows a visible chain of evidence

For Universidade Nova de Lisboa, start with a compact question that names both a phenomenon and a setting. It might concern a health outcome, a local environmental condition, a technological practice, a legal or economic relationship, a historical source, or a social process. Then specify what kind of material could answer it: laboratory observations, surveys, interview records, published texts, sensor data, maps, images, administrative records, code, or a dataset. Search the portal for those terms, taking note of the unit or researcher whose description is closest. This sequence avoids matching solely on a generic word that happens to appear across several unrelated areas.

The final step is to keep the conclusion modest. The public portal can show an active research landscape, but it cannot settle questions about present supervision, access to a given dataset, a laboratory's equipment, or a person's current availability. A local profile or unit page may clarify part of that picture. If it does, use only the specific detail it contains. If it does not, leave the remaining point for later verification. This is how NOVA's searchable research record can support a careful comparison without turning broad visibility into an unsupported promise.

Institution record

Country
Portugal
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.