Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Lisbon

PortugalEurope

#230

QS World University Rankings 2026

52.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#230

QS World University Rankings 2026

#260

QS World University Rankings 2025

52.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
57.1
QS 2026 rank
#193

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
46.3
QS 2026 rank
#289

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
15.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
51.4
QS 2026 rank
#367

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
14.3
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
58.6
QS 2026 rank
#350

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
62.6
QS 2026 rank
#317

International research network

QS 2026 score
98.4
QS 2026 rank
#17

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
97.3
QS 2026 rank
#54

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
79.3
QS 2026 rank
#184
University profile

About University of Lisbon

Schools, research units, laboratories, and a research portal create a layered ULisboa map

University of Lisbon, also presented as ULisboa, makes schools, research units, associate laboratories, and a research portal visible in its public overview. This structure provides several routes from a broad field to a more concrete research setting. A school can show an academic base, a research unit can identify a continuing community of inquiry, an associate laboratory can indicate a shared research environment, and the portal can help locate research information. These layers should not be treated as identical. A research unit may offer a closer place to understand a topic, while a school supplies the disciplinary context and a portal helps trace a person, output, or project.

The public overview also describes a wide range of knowledge areas and highlights research and innovation across the university. That is useful background for an interdisciplinary question, but it does not identify the right local home on its own. A question about water, mobility, health, architecture, law, digital systems, agriculture, or social change needs to be narrowed to its object and method. The next page to examine is the one that names a research unit, laboratory, researcher, or project that works with that evidence. This preserves the difference between a large institutional ecosystem and a specific research context.

Researcher development, data care, biosafety, and professional conduct are supporting contexts

ULisboa's public research material describes an institutional process concerned with researcher development and the wider research environment. The topics mentioned include data management, biosafety, communication, mentoring, training, career development, equality, and professional conduct. These are important conditions around research, especially when work uses data, biological material, interdisciplinary teams, or shared resources. They should not be mistaken for direct evidence of a particular study. The direct study page must make clear what is being investigated and how the relevant methods are being used.

This distinction can clarify a complex research question. Data management may be relevant to a computational or social-science project, while biosafety may matter to laboratory work. Communication and mentoring may be important parts of a researcher environment but do not tell a reader whether a group studies a particular material, population, or system. By keeping support conditions separate from the research object, a profile can describe both without overreaching. University of Lisbon's public information helps map the ecosystem around researchers; a smaller academic page should establish the direct subject connection.

Use the University of Lisbon structure to test a narrow research connection

A practical University of Lisbon research note starts with a question that can be tied to evidence. It may involve a water system, clinical process, social group, urban space, legal source, ecological condition, data model, material, or cultural record. Then identify the closest school and the research unit, laboratory, or working group that visibly anchors the subject. The research portal can help locate relevant records, but the explanation should remain close to the primary research home. If the topic needs a wider institutional condition such as data care or biosafety, include that only after the direct academic link has been established.

Close with the question that the available pages have not answered. A research unit may fit a field while its current projects are unclear. A portal record can show an output without establishing an ongoing line of work. A university-level process can describe a research environment without showing a specific method. These limits make the profile easier to revise and trust. University of Lisbon makes its schools, research units, laboratories, portal, and researcher-environment material visible. A carefully bounded evidence trail turns that information into a useful comparison of one possible research setting.

Institution record

Country
Portugal
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
XL
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.