Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University

Russian FederationEurope

#477

QS World University Rankings 2026

33.4

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#477

QS World University Rankings 2026

#456

QS World University Rankings 2025

33.4

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
20.3
QS 2026 rank
#606

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
34.1
QS 2026 rank
#421

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
95.3
QS 2026 rank
#71

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
18.1
QS 2026 rank
#748

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
38.6
QS 2026 rank
#512

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
54.8
QS 2026 rank
#380

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
55.6
QS 2026 rank
#368

International research network

QS 2026 score
47.1
QS 2026 rank
#801

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
38
QS 2026 rank
#458

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
21.9
QS 2026 rank
#801
University profile

About Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University

MIPT's doctoral catalogue turns a broad physics label into many separate research questions

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, commonly known as MIPT, publishes a detailed doctoral catalogue across physics and astronomy, biological sciences, computer and information science, mathematics and mechanics, and chemical sciences. The physics and astronomy entries include solar activity and space weather, space plasma, condensed matter, quantum nanoplasmonics and nanophotonics, particle physics and cosmology, quantum information, superconductivity, neutron work, and optical properties of carbon nanostructures. This breadth is important because a phrase such as physics research does not identify one material, theory, tool, or measurement practice.

The titles need to be kept at their published level. A catalogue entry about quantum information does not describe every quantum group at MIPT. A title about plasma astrophysics does not establish a shared method with an entry on high-temperature superconductors. A doctoral listing can show that a specified subject is part of the public academic map. It becomes much more useful when a reader follows it to a laboratory, group, researcher, article, or project record that explains what is being examined and what form of evidence is involved.

Biology, computation, and materials appear as distinct MIPT routes rather than a single technology story

The same catalogue makes life-science and computational topics visible beside physical science. It includes molecular neurobiology of memory, protein turnover, genomic and transcriptomic work, bioinformatics, computational biology, cancer research, stem-cell reprogramming, and antimicrobial-resistance mechanisms. Elsewhere, the published titles include numerical simulation, neutron or radiation transport, mathematical modelling of biological-fluid flows, applied combinatorial optimisation, computational fluid dynamics, supramolecular chemistry, and conducting polymers or composites. These are not interchangeable examples of technology. They point to biological materials, mathematical structures, software, physical systems, and chemical composition in different combinations.

MIPT's English site also identifies research laboratories and technological infrastructure as part of its institutional setting. That information can explain why the doctoral catalogue contains both experimental and computational work. It cannot establish the resources used by a particular title or the status of a particular line of inquiry. A biological question may call for samples, sequencing, molecular assays, images, or clinical context. A numerical or physical question may require equations, code, simulated systems, device measurements, or experimental data. The topic itself determines the more relevant record to inspect next.

A specific MIPT question should be matched to its material before it is matched to a school name

For MIPT, an accurate note can begin with an object such as a plasma process, a quantum material, a neutron measurement, a genomic pattern, a protein system, a combustion process, an optimisation problem, or a software model. It should then name the evidence that could address that object: spectra, detector output, samples, sequences, equations, simulation results, code, laboratory measurements, or published analyses. This is more precise than asking whether the institute covers a fashionable field. It offers a test for whether a catalogue title and its nearest local record actually concern the same question.

The official pages support a rich public map of named doctoral subjects and research-oriented infrastructure. They do not establish an assured relationship with a particular laboratory, a person's future role, or an unstated research method. A careful description remains modest: record the public topic, identify the kind of evidence it implies, and look for the page that connects both to a defined local setting. That method helps a reader use MIPT's long catalogue as a research-discovery tool rather than as a collection of labels that promise more than the public evidence shows.

Institution record

Country
Russian Federation
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
M
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.