Chiang Mai University
#526
QS World University Rankings 2026
30.9
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#526
QS World University Rankings 2026
#567
QS World University Rankings 2025
30.9
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 48.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #236
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 30.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #467
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 22
- QS 2026 rank
- #790
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 8.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 5.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 8.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 13.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 65.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #613
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 28.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #584
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 67.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #355
About Chiang Mai University
Chiang Mai University offers a broad faculty and graduate-school map
Chiang Mai University's official pages organise study through faculties, the Graduate School, international and interdisciplinary colleges, and subject-specific institutes. The public programme map lists agriculture, dentistry, associated medical sciences, law, business administration, nursing, medicine, pharmacy, humanities, political science and public administration, fine arts, science, engineering, education, economics, architecture, social sciences, veterinary medicine, public health, and agro-industry. It also identifies the International College of Digital Innovation, the Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary School, the College of Arts, Media and Technology, the School of Public Policy, and the Biomedical Engineering Institute.
This structure is helpful for an applicant whose subject crosses traditional faculty boundaries. Digital innovation, biomedical engineering, public policy, and arts and technology can connect with established faculties while keeping their own academic setting. The list does not tell a reader how every degree is taught or which research group is active in a particular year. Trace the question into the faculty, programme, institute, or graduate-school page that owns the route.
A finance research talk shows how CMU connects methods with real decisions
A recent official news item from the Chiang Mai University Business School describes a Research Talk on the role of startup rating agencies in improving venture-investment decisions. The session addressed information asymmetry, the use of rating companies, and analytical models for deciding when such services may be useful. The event was organised by the Department of Finance and was open to faculty members and people interested in business finance and investment. This is one specific example, not a summary of every business or finance research activity at CMU.
The example is useful because it shows a research question being linked to a problem, a method, and a decision setting. Information asymmetry gives the topic a clear economic mechanism. Rating agencies provide an institutional object. Investment decisions provide the setting in which the analysis matters. An applicant can use the same logic in another field: name the object, identify the relationship being studied, and choose evidence that can answer the question. A broad label such as innovation or entrepreneurship becomes more useful only after that narrowing step.
How to compare a CMU programme or research route
Use the programme finder to identify the level and faculty closest to your preparation, then check whether the route sits in a conventional faculty, an interdisciplinary school, or a specialist institute. For a digital-health question, for example, the relevant path could connect medicine, engineering, associated medical sciences, data, and the Biomedical Engineering Institute. For a question about technology and society, the College of Arts, Media and Technology or the School of Public Policy may provide a different academic home. These are starting points for research, not conclusions about a particular programme.
Keep the official news item separate from the formal degree information. The news page shows a current research conversation, while faculty, graduate-school, and programme pages explain the route itself. Use the figures in the data panel only as broad institutional context. In your own record, name the CMU programme, its responsible unit, the research question, the method, and the page you will revisit for a final check. This distinction matters when a similar programme title appears in more than one faculty.
Institution record
- Country
- Thailand
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.