Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Chulalongkorn University

ThailandAsia

#221

QS World University Rankings 2026

53.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#221

QS World University Rankings 2026

#229

QS World University Rankings 2025

53.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
82
QS 2026 rank
#89

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
52.7
QS 2026 rank
#233

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
44.8
QS 2026 rank
#439

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
12.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
32
QS 2026 rank
#564

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
6.2
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
11
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
80.6
QS 2026 rank
#342

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
96.4
QS 2026 rank
#64

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
80
QS 2026 rank
#169
University profile

About Chulalongkorn University

Research and innovation sit alongside faculties, schools, colleges, and institutes

Chulalongkorn University makes several academic and research layers visible through its public navigation. The university distinguishes faculties and schools, colleges and institutes, academic services, research and innovation, the Office of Research Affairs, Chula DigiVerse, and the CU Innovation Hub. These are different routes through the institution. A faculty or school can show a disciplinary base. A college or institute can identify a specialised setting. A research office describes a university-level function. A repository or innovation hub can make outputs, tools, or development pathways visible. A close research comparison needs to use each layer for the question it can actually answer.

The university's public research material also shows how a topic can cross disciplines without losing its local context. Current items touch on cocoa-based animal feed, urban well-being and sustainability, climate adaptation, wildlife questions, cultural practice, and digital or creative work. These examples do not form one combined research programme. They illustrate how different objects require different kinds of evidence: an agricultural supplement may need animal and material knowledge; an urban living lab may involve place-based observation and design; a climate question may connect data, policy, and environmental conditions. The research object should guide the next search for the relevant group or unit.

A digital repository and an innovation hub reveal different forms of research activity

Chula DigiVerse is presented as a repository for digital academic works, including theses, journal articles, research reports, course materials, and learning resources. It provides a route for tracing how a subject has been documented and shared. The CU Innovation Hub describes work around incubation, intellectual-property support, training, partnership development, and project showcases. That is a different type of information. A repository can help locate a scholarly output or a research record, while an innovation hub can show a pathway for turning work into a project or collaboration. Neither should be used alone to infer the exact current work of a particular laboratory.

The distinction is helpful for a topic with both a research and an implementation dimension. A person might find a digital record related to a subject, then need a faculty, institute, or researcher page to identify the research home. A project may be visible through an innovation route, yet the methods and academic setting still require closer checking. Chulalongkorn University's public material makes these layers accessible without making them identical. By keeping the output, project, and institutional-setting evidence separate, a profile can explain a research connection without extending the available information beyond what the relevant page supports.

Frame a Chulalongkorn University question with evidence that stays close to the work

A practical Chulalongkorn University profile begins by naming the research object and the likely evidence. It might be an animal feed ingredient, an urban setting, an environmental system, a cultural practice, a dataset, a prototype, a health question, or a digital resource. Next, identify the faculty, school, college, institute, or research group closest to that object. Use the repository, research office, or innovation hub only to explain a supporting layer that is visibly relevant. This sequence makes a broad research-and-innovation landscape easier to read because it begins with what must be studied rather than with an abstract institutional theme.

The closing line can record what is not yet visible. A public research item may describe a compelling question without showing a continuing project. A repository entry may show an output but not the group’s current direction. An innovation pathway may reveal activity without supplying the underlying method. These limits protect the profile from overstatement. Chulalongkorn University provides public connections among academic units, research services, digital records, and innovation pathways. A carefully defined object of inquiry helps turn those connections into a grounded view of one research setting instead of a general summary of the university.

Institution record

Country
Thailand
Region
Asia
Status
Public
QS size code
XL
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.