Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Middle East Technical University

TürkiyeAsia

#269

QS World University Rankings 2026

48.5

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#269

QS World University Rankings 2026

#285

QS World University Rankings 2025

48.5

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
44.8
QS 2026 rank
#265

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
88.7
QS 2026 rank
#77

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
12.8
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
34.4
QS 2026 rank
#528

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
18
QS 2026 rank
#743

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
31
QS 2026 rank
#579

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
36.9
QS 2026 rank
#528

International research network

QS 2026 score
79.2
QS 2026 rank
#365

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
82.2
QS 2026 rank
#148

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
71.8
QS 2026 rank
#294
University profile

About Middle East Technical University

Middle East Technical University maps research through centres and laboratories

Middle East Technical University publishes a research-centre list alongside routes for laboratories and a central laboratory. The list creates a useful map for readers who need to turn a broad subject into a smaller academic setting. It names centres connected with biomaterials and tissue engineering, climate change and sustainable development, computer-aided design, manufacturing and robotics, energy materials and storage devices, image analysis, petroleum research, robotics and artificial intelligence, science and technology policies, space and accelerator technologies, wind energy, cybersecurity, modelling and simulation, and the built environment. These titles show that METU's public research structure reaches across technical, environmental, social, and design questions. They are clues to search further, not complete descriptions of the work inside each centre.

A named centre can be more informative than a general university label, but it still contains several layers. Biomaterials may involve materials science, tissue engineering, laboratory work, imaging, or clinical questions. A climate centre can involve observation, policy, models, design, energy, or ecosystems. A robotics route could focus on systems, sensors, manufacturing, control, or human use. The centre title alone does not settle these differences. Use it to find the local page that identifies a project, research group, equipment, dataset, field setting, or method. That extra step protects the reader from treating a broad centre name as proof of a precise research match.

METU's centre list brings technical work into contact with public and regional questions

The METU list includes research settings that are not limited to engineering hardware. It names the Center for Applied Ethics, the Center for Black Sea and Central Asia, the Center for Disaster Management, the Center for Entrepreneurship Research, the Center for Research and Assessment of Historical Environment, the Center for Society and Science Research, and a centre for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. This range matters for a research question that sits between technical systems and people, policy, places, institutions, or learning. An artificial-intelligence question, for example, might need work on computation as well as ethics, public use, education, or regulation. The public list shows possible routes, but a reader must still establish whether a current project connects them.

The same principle applies to centres with strong regional or applied language. A Black Sea and Central Asia setting may point toward a geographical or policy context. A disaster-management setting may involve risk, infrastructure, communities, communication, or modelling. A historical-environment centre may bring material heritage into conversation with architecture, documentation, planning, or public interpretation. The fact that these centres appear on one university list does not make their projects interchangeable. Start with the object of research, identify the METU setting that names it most directly, and read the local description for the form of evidence being used. This is how a directory becomes a disciplined research search rather than a collection of attractive labels.

Choose a METU research path by matching a question to visible practice

For a Middle East Technical University comparison, write the research question before choosing a centre. It might concern the storage behaviour of a material, a robotics task, an image-analysis problem, a wind-energy system, a cybersecurity issue, a heritage site, a climate process, or a policy decision. Search the METU centre and laboratory routes for the closest phrase. Then record what the local page reveals about practice. It may refer to prototype development, laboratory measurements, field observation, simulation, image data, design work, technical testing, policy analysis, interviews, or documentary material. The key is not to assume that a centre does every form of work associated with its title. The evidence needs to come from the centre, group, or project that publicly describes the activity.

METU's general information page presents a university with faculties, graduate schools, and research activity, while the centre list offers a more detailed route toward research settings. Read the two pages differently. The general information explains the broader institutional setting. The research-centre list offers a way to narrow a search. A current local page is needed for a conclusion about a particular question. In a final note, keep only three things: the METU unit, the exact research object, and the publicly visible practice or material. Anything else should remain a question for further checking. This format is concise, honest, and far more useful than treating a large list of centres as an automatic personal fit.

Institution record

Country
Türkiye
Region
Asia
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
October 31, 2025

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.