Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Missouri University of Science and Technology

United States of AmericaAmericas

#628

QS World University Rankings 2026

27.4

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#628

QS World University Rankings 2026

#527

QS World University Rankings 2025

27.4

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
4.9
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
10.5
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
8.6
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
87.7
QS 2026 rank
#112

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
26.9
QS 2026 rank
#627

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
32.5
QS 2026 rank
#563

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
35.3
QS 2026 rank
#547

International research network

QS 2026 score
41.7
QS 2026 rank
#801

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
8.8
QS 2026 rank
#801

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
34
QS 2026 rank
#801
University profile

About Missouri University of Science and Technology

Missouri S&T combines design teams, academic work, and research settings that connect technical questions with practice

Missouri University of Science and Technology describes collaboration as part of learning through research, design teams, student organisations, and work with professors and peers. Its twenty-one design teams give this idea a visible form: students can work in cross-functional groups around technical challenges while developing leadership and communication through the process. That does not make every project the same. A design question may focus on a device, material, system, performance measure, user need, or environmental condition. The important first step is to identify the technical object and the constraint that gives the question shape. A team name or broad field can suggest a direction, but it does not by itself explain the tools, assumptions, or testing involved.

The university's description of hands-on learning also connects classroom work with real-world questions. This can be especially useful for a reader who wants to move between a technical discipline and a practical setting. A materials question may concern strength, structure, durability, or processing. An infrastructure question may concern a bridge, building, sensor, maintenance decision, or extreme event. A computing question may concern a dataset, model, machine, network, or simulation. These are not interchangeable examples. Defining the object and the setting early makes it easier to locate the right centre, facility, design team, or research group and to explain why the topic needs that particular environment.

Missouri S&T research centres span computing, infrastructure, materials, energy, critical minerals, and society

The Office of the Vice Chancellor of Research and Innovation lists university research centers, consortia, and constellations as settings for work across academic programmes. Its Center for Biomedical Research identifies areas such as drug delivery, cancer treatment, bioactive materials, tissue repair, and biomarkers. The Center for High Performance Computing provides computing capacity through The Forge and the Numerically Intensive Computing Cluster. The Center for Infrastructure Engineering Studies describes sustainable construction materials, bridge and building rehabilitation, resistance to extreme events, and structural-health monitoring.

Other named settings include the Center for Intelligent Infrastructure Research, the Center for Research in Energy and Environment, the Center for Science, Technology, and Society, the Intelligent Systems Center, the Materials Research Center, and the Thomas J. O'Keefe Center for Critical Minerals. Their listed interests include robotic inspection, sensors, artificial intelligence, contaminants, science and society, smart grids, ceramics, metals, polymers, life-cycle assessment, and environmental mitigation. A reader should not collapse this list into a single technical identity. A sensor question may focus on measurement or decision-making. A critical-minerals question may focus on recovery, process streams, policy, or environmental effects.

Missouri S&T turns technical interests into focused questions about objects, facilities, and collaborators

Missouri S&T also identifies specialised facilities and collaborative groups that can sharpen a broad interest. The Advanced Materials Characterization Core Facility lists electron microscopy, X-ray methods, micro-computed tomography, atomic force microscopy, nanoindentation, thermogravimetry, and spectrometry among its capabilities. Elsewhere, transportation, aerospace and manufacturing, steel manufacturing, construction innovation, and electromagnetic compatibility appear as consortium settings. These names are useful because they connect a problem to possible tools and collaborators. A materials question becomes more specific when it names a sample, property, condition, or measurement. A transportation question needs a vehicle, road, structure, service, model, or safety concern. A manufacturing question may require a process, component, quality measure, or production context.

A focused search can therefore begin with a technical phrase and immediately ask what must be observed, built, measured, modelled, or compared. Then identify the closest research centre, facility, consortium, or design setting. Finally, check whether the people and resources there match the question's scale. A project on infrastructure sensors is different from one on bioactive glass, even if both use advanced equipment and collaborative work. A project on critical-minerals recovery is different from one on cyber-physical infrastructure, even if both involve systems thinking. This approach keeps Missouri S&T's broad research environment useful without turning a long list of centres into a claim that every topic uses the same method or has the same practical purpose.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
M
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.