Ohio University
#1001
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#1001
QS World University Rankings 2026
#1001
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 10.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 13.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 7.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 14
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 3.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 6.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 11.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 51.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 27.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #598
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 38.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
About Ohio University
Ohio University links Athens with regional sites, professional programs, and online study
Ohio University describes a residential campus in Athens, regional commuter campuses, extension locations in Dublin and Cleveland, and online study. This geographic structure can shape the setting for a project without deciding the question in advance. A health topic may involve a service, clinical learning activity, public information, or an organisational process. A business or public-affairs question can focus on a decision, institution, policy, or local record. A project connected with a regional campus might examine a defined community issue rather than claim to speak for an entire area. Location becomes useful when it identifies the people, materials, processes, or history that the work can actually address.
The university also presents activities ranging from local waterways and game research to immersive design, podcast production, consulting, and concrete-canoe work. These examples make clear that hands-on activity has many forms. A waterways question might require sampling, mapping, or a comparison across sites. A game study could focus on an interface, player action, narrative, or design decision. A podcast project may analyse an archive, interview, sound form, or audience response. A materials project can identify the component, test condition, and performance measure. The research question gains force when the practical activity is tied to a specific claim rather than described as experience in general.
Avionics, biotechnology, history, corrosion, physics, psychology, and fine arts open different Ohio questions
Ohio University's research division identifies work in avionics, biotechnology, communication, environmental studies, history, pipeline corrosion, physics, psychology, and fine arts such as ceramics, film, and printmaking. This range is valuable because it shows that a single university can contain very different research materials. An avionics project could examine a system response, component, simulation, or operational condition. Biotechnology may begin with a biological process, sample, instrument, or treatment question. History can work through an archive, period, institution, or interpretation. Corrosion research needs a material, environment, time scale, and measure of change. Fine-arts inquiry can centre on an artefact, technique, viewing context, or process of making.
The differences matter when choosing a method. A physics question may require a model, controlled measurement, or theoretical relationship. A psychology question needs a defined behaviour, group, task, or response. Communication research can study a message, platform, audience, or institutional practice. Environmental work may use field observations, maps, samples, or records across time. An Ohio University project becomes more rigorous when it states which material is central and which comparison will make the proposed relationship visible. A list of disciplines should never stand in for that decision. The point of a broad research map is to help a question find the route that matches its actual form.
Ohio University research gains clarity from a stated record, comparison, and limit
Ohio University makes research compliance, shared equipment and facilities, centres and institutes, computing, and human-participant review visible within its research division. These parts of a research environment serve different purposes. Equipment matters when a question depends on a particular measurement or experimental condition. Computing matters when a dataset, model, or simulation needs a transparent process. Human-participant review becomes relevant when people provide information or take part in an activity. A centre or institute can bring a sustained conversation around a problem, but it does not make the boundaries of a project disappear. Those boundaries need to be decided in the question itself.
A useful Ohio plan can state the core relationship in one sentence, followed by the record that will be examined and the comparison that will test the first interpretation. It might compare two materials exposed to a stated condition, two groups responding to a message, two time periods in an archive, two locations in an environmental study, or two versions of a design. The result may be modest: a measured difference, a documented pattern, an interpretation of selected materials, or an account of a particular experience. Modesty is a strength when it keeps a conclusion attached to what the project actually considered.
Institution record
- Country
- United States of America
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.