Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Saint Louis University

United States of AmericaAmericas

#951

QS World University Rankings 2026

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#951

QS World University Rankings 2026

#951

QS World University Rankings 2025

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
5.7
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
4.2
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
50.8
QS 2026 rank
#373

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
23.8
QS 2026 rank
#660

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
20.6
QS 2026 rank
#701

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
42.2
QS 2026 rank
#473

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
31.5
QS 2026 rank
#596

International research network

QS 2026 score
23.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
18.5
QS 2026 rank
#748

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
35.9
QS 2026 rank
#801
University profile

About Saint Louis University

Saint Louis University pairs Jesuit purpose with observable research questions

Saint Louis University brings undergraduate, graduate, and online study together with a Catholic and Jesuit approach to service, teaching, and research. Its public research information spans humanistic inquiry, health, geospatial science, technology, data services, and inventions. That range can help a reader whose first idea is larger than a single department. An urban enquiry may instead focus on a historical record, a health difference, a map, a water condition, a digital system, or the way people experience a public space. These are connected concerns, but they ask for different material. The beginning of a useful project is to identify the particular relationship that needs explanation.

The university also presents student research as an active part of learning, with examples that range from small satellites to excavations of ancient castles. Such examples show that a question can be technical, historical, spatial, or cultural without needing to become abstract. A satellite project might focus on a sensor, signal, orbit-related task, or data output. An excavation question may turn on an artefact, site layer, document, or interpretation of a specific practice. A civic question can examine one service, neighbourhood condition, or public decision. The setting becomes meaningful when it tells the researcher what can be observed and what must remain outside the study.

At SLU, geospatial, health, and humanistic work start with different materials

Saint Louis University's research strengths include humanistic work across fields such as English, history, and philosophy; geospatial work concerned with how location shapes issues; and health research that examines disease mechanisms and treatment questions. These areas are not interchangeable. A humanistic enquiry may use texts, archives, images, objects, or records of public conversation. A geospatial project may require maps, location data, a carefully chosen boundary, and a comparison between places. A health question might begin with a biological process, a clinical pathway, a measure, or a pattern in a defined population. The method follows the object rather than the title of the topic.

The university's research facilities include medical and health centres, science and engineering space, libraries and museums, and services for specialised data and software. A facility is most helpful after the researcher can say why a particular kind of material matters. A question about water resources may require a spatial record, a physical measurement, policy documents, or observations from selected sites. A question about chronic pain may concern a biological mechanism, treatment process, communication practice, or patient experience. Naming one of these routes gives a study a defensible scope. It also makes clear whether the result should be an interpretation, measurement, prototype, or account of a process.

A Saint Louis University project becomes stronger by making its boundary visible

A practical way to begin at Saint Louis University is to write down the object, setting, and comparison before choosing a broad field label. The object might be a document, sample, map layer, device, image, service process, or archive item. The setting could be a laboratory, library collection, clinical context, neighbourhood, waterway, or digital environment. The comparison may be between times, locations, versions, conditions, or defined groups. These choices make a wide concern manageable. They also help a reader decide whether a humanities route, health route, geospatial route, or technical route offers the most useful way to develop the question.

A final safeguard is to make the conclusion no broader than the material. A map-based pattern can describe variation across chosen locations without explaining every cause. A laboratory observation can identify a difference under stated conditions without settling a larger public debate. An archive can illuminate a historical or cultural question without representing every experience. These limits make the work more useful, not less. Saint Louis University's academic and research environment offers room for questions that connect knowledge with service. A transparent boundary allows that connection to be made carefully, with a claim that another reader can inspect and understand.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Private not for Profit
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.