University of Oregon
#751
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#751
QS World University Rankings 2026
#801
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 23.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #543
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 22.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #592
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 14.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 25.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #632
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 10.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 5.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 4.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 53.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #785
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 36.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #470
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 55.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #582
About University of Oregon
University of Oregon links wildfire research to hazards, places, and communities
University of Oregon presents wildfire research as a question of preparation, prevention, recovery, smoke, and community conditions. Its public work connects this topic with the Oregon Hazards Lab and the Department of Earth Sciences. That pairing is useful because wildfire is not a single object of study. A question may focus on a landscape, an air-quality condition, an evacuation decision, a communication system, a household experience, or a public response. Each focus needs a different setting and different information. A landscape question may need maps, field observations, or environmental measurements. A community question may need interviews, policy documents, survey responses, or local records. Naming the focus avoids reducing a complex issue to one broad label.
The Oregon research pages also describe work that helps communities build environmental resilience. This makes place especially important. A topic about a coast, forest, watershed, or city should identify the people and conditions connected with that place. It should also distinguish a physical process from a social or institutional response. For example, a wildfire question can concern how a hazard moves, how smoke is experienced, how information travels, or how a service changes during an event. Those are related but not identical inquiries. A reader can use Oregon's visible research routes to narrow the question before looking for the group, project, or setting that uses similar language.
Birdsong, exercise, and coastal ecology show Oregon's different research objects
University of Oregon stories also move across very different kinds of inquiry. One describes an artificial-intelligence tool for analyzing canary songs, connecting animal behavior with questions about speech and language in the brain. Another examines how hormone variation relates to the way exercise feels. A coastal story follows students who built an interactive experience around the wildlife and habitats of Otter Rock Marine Reserve. These examples are useful because they make the research object visible. Birdsong is not the same as language use in a human group. Exercise experience is not the same as a biological measurement. A marine reserve can involve habitats, species, digital interpretation, conservation, or visitor learning. The object determines the next question.
The names attached to these examples also help show different settings. The Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact and the Institute of Neuroscience appear with the birdsong work. The Oregon Performance Research Laboratory and Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance appear with the exercise story. The Oregon Institute of Marine Biology appears with the coastal work. Those settings can guide a reader toward a more specific search, but they do not establish that every nearby topic belongs to each one. A useful inquiry keeps the phenomenon, setting, and method connected in the same description.
An Oregon inquiry becomes sharper when place, method, and question meet
An effective Oregon inquiry can begin with a place and a phenomenon. It might concern smoke in a particular community, wildlife in a coastal reserve, a pattern in song, a physical response to exercise, a classroom tool, or an environmental condition. The next decision is methodological. A hazard question may use maps and observation. A behavior question may use recordings, coded observations, or computational analysis. A health or performance question may need carefully defined measures and participant experiences. A coastal question may combine biological observation with digital design or visitor interpretation. The method should follow from the object rather than from a broad label such as climate, health, or technology.
University of Oregon also describes work in education, injury prevention, languages and cultures, accessible sportswear, and environmental resilience. These areas can overlap, yet a reader should still identify the exact point of connection. A question about access may involve a garment, an interface, a public space, or a service. A question about culture may involve a language practice, a text, a collection, or a community history. Oregon's research activity offers many entry points for careful exploration. The most productive one is the route that connects a clearly stated object with a place and a method that can be examined directly.
Institution record
- Country
- United States of America
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.