Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Texas at Dallas

United States of AmericaAmericas

#597

QS World University Rankings 2026

28.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#597

QS World University Rankings 2026

#596

QS World University Rankings 2025

28.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
19.3
QS 2026 rank
#641

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
33.7
QS 2026 rank
#426

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
5.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
43
QS 2026 rank
#438

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
14.4
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
61.1
QS 2026 rank
#335

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
64.9
QS 2026 rank
#305

International research network

QS 2026 score
55.3
QS 2026 rank
#765

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
9.1
QS 2026 rank
#801

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
48.9
QS 2026 rank
#733
University profile

About University of Texas at Dallas

UT Dallas uses North Texas connections, campus stories, and Roadmap 2030 to frame a changing university setting

The University of Texas at Dallas presents itself within North Texas and frames its current direction through Roadmap 2030. The plan names support for student journeys, innovation, regional prosperity, and interdisciplinary opportunities as connected priorities. That language is useful as a map of institutional direction, but it cannot replace a clearly bounded research question. A question related to regional growth might concern semiconductor work, transport, health, education, arts, or environmental change. Each path needs a particular object and setting. The university's current news includes work related to the semiconductor workforce and a study on autonomous vehicles and parking congestion, showing how regional questions can connect technology, labour, infrastructure, and everyday movement without becoming one undifferentiated topic.

A person exploring mobility, for example, should decide whether the focus is vehicle behaviour, parking use, urban design, energy demand, policy, or user experience. A person exploring the semiconductor workforce should distinguish between technical preparation, organisational practices, local labour demand, supply chains, or public strategy. Making that distinction prevents a broad institutional theme from becoming a vague project description.

The UT Dallas research office directs readers toward centres, labs, research news, and expert profiles

The Office of Research and Innovation at UT Dallas provides several different routes into research activity: centres and institutes, labs and groups, research news, and researcher profiles. These routes serve different purposes. A centre may show a sustained area of collective work. A lab can point toward a more defined technical or disciplinary setting. A news item can introduce a recent question or result. A profile can help identify a person's area of expertise. The research page, for example, lists Hervé Abdi in cognition and neuroscience, Aria Nosratinia in electrical engineering and computer engineering, and Shalini Prasad in bioengineering. Those descriptions give useful starting points, but they should be followed by closer material about the person, group, or project before a reader assumes a specific method or current activity.

The same page highlights research questions involving viral roadblocks, energy technologies, and partnerships connected to technological work. These topics illustrate how one university can contain projects with very different materials and scales. A biology question may involve a molecular mechanism, model, and experimental procedure. An energy-technology question may involve materials, devices, performance measures, or systems integration. A partnership question may concern the technical work itself, institutional coordination, or a broader regional objective. The next step is to identify which part of the topic is actually being investigated. This keeps a reader from treating an exciting title as proof that every related subject, method, or outcome belongs to the same research setting.

A UT Dallas topic becomes clearer when a reader tests it against the right unit, person, question, and material

A focused search at UT Dallas can move in four parts. Start with a topic in ordinary language, such as mobility, energy, neuroscience, bioengineering, or computing. Next, name the object: a parking pattern, a battery material, a neural process, a biological sensor, an algorithm, or a communication system. Then find the closest centre, lab, researcher profile, or news item. Finally, identify the materials needed to examine the question in practice, whether that is a dataset, device, experiment, model, image, interview, policy document, or technical record. This sequence helps a broad interest become a question that can be examined instead of a list of related words.

UT Dallas brings together campus life, regional links, interdisciplinary planning, and research routes, but those layers should remain distinct during exploration. A campus event may be relevant context without becoming a research case. A regional priority may guide attention without determining a method. A researcher profile can identify expertise without describing every current project. The most useful result is a clear connection between a defined object, the setting where it is studied, and the specific group carrying the work forward. That connection makes later conversations more practical and helps a reader explain why a particular UT Dallas route fits the question they want to pursue.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.