University of Texas at Dallas
#597
QS World University Rankings 2026
28.3
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#597
QS World University Rankings 2026
#596
QS World University Rankings 2025
28.3
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 19.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #641
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 33.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #426
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 5.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 43
- QS 2026 rank
- #438
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 14.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 61.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #335
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 64.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #305
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 55.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #765
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 9.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 48.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #733
About University of Texas at Dallas
UT Dallas uses North Texas connections, campus stories, and Roadmap 2030 to frame a changing university setting
The University of Texas at Dallas presents itself within North Texas and frames its current direction through Roadmap 2030. The plan names support for student journeys, innovation, regional prosperity, and interdisciplinary opportunities as connected priorities. That language is useful as a map of institutional direction, but it cannot replace a clearly bounded research question. A question related to regional growth might concern semiconductor work, transport, health, education, arts, or environmental change. Each path needs a particular object and setting. The university's current news includes work related to the semiconductor workforce and a study on autonomous vehicles and parking congestion, showing how regional questions can connect technology, labour, infrastructure, and everyday movement without becoming one undifferentiated topic.
A person exploring mobility, for example, should decide whether the focus is vehicle behaviour, parking use, urban design, energy demand, policy, or user experience. A person exploring the semiconductor workforce should distinguish between technical preparation, organisational practices, local labour demand, supply chains, or public strategy. Making that distinction prevents a broad institutional theme from becoming a vague project description.
The UT Dallas research office directs readers toward centres, labs, research news, and expert profiles
The Office of Research and Innovation at UT Dallas provides several different routes into research activity: centres and institutes, labs and groups, research news, and researcher profiles. These routes serve different purposes. A centre may show a sustained area of collective work. A lab can point toward a more defined technical or disciplinary setting. A news item can introduce a recent question or result. A profile can help identify a person's area of expertise. The research page, for example, lists Hervé Abdi in cognition and neuroscience, Aria Nosratinia in electrical engineering and computer engineering, and Shalini Prasad in bioengineering. Those descriptions give useful starting points, but they should be followed by closer material about the person, group, or project before a reader assumes a specific method or current activity.
The same page highlights research questions involving viral roadblocks, energy technologies, and partnerships connected to technological work. These topics illustrate how one university can contain projects with very different materials and scales. A biology question may involve a molecular mechanism, model, and experimental procedure. An energy-technology question may involve materials, devices, performance measures, or systems integration. A partnership question may concern the technical work itself, institutional coordination, or a broader regional objective. The next step is to identify which part of the topic is actually being investigated. This keeps a reader from treating an exciting title as proof that every related subject, method, or outcome belongs to the same research setting.
A UT Dallas topic becomes clearer when a reader tests it against the right unit, person, question, and material
A focused search at UT Dallas can move in four parts. Start with a topic in ordinary language, such as mobility, energy, neuroscience, bioengineering, or computing. Next, name the object: a parking pattern, a battery material, a neural process, a biological sensor, an algorithm, or a communication system. Then find the closest centre, lab, researcher profile, or news item. Finally, identify the materials needed to examine the question in practice, whether that is a dataset, device, experiment, model, image, interview, policy document, or technical record. This sequence helps a broad interest become a question that can be examined instead of a list of related words.
UT Dallas brings together campus life, regional links, interdisciplinary planning, and research routes, but those layers should remain distinct during exploration. A campus event may be relevant context without becoming a research case. A regional priority may guide attention without determining a method. A researcher profile can identify expertise without describing every current project. The most useful result is a clear connection between a defined object, the setting where it is studied, and the specific group carrying the work forward. That connection makes later conversations more practical and helps a reader explain why a particular UT Dallas route fits the question they want to pursue.
Institution record
- Country
- United States of America
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.