University of Tulsa
#1001
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#1001
QS World University Rankings 2026
#1001
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 2.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 5.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 49.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #387
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 15.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 20.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #699
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 39.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #493
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 45.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #461
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 22.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 22.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #682
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 46.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #799
About University of Tulsa
University of Tulsa connects art, zoology, robotics, cyber work, and fabrication through research
University of Tulsa presents research opportunities across a range described as extending from art to zoology. Its research structure also names the Institute for Robotics and Autonomy, the Oklahoma Cyber Innovation Institute, and the Fab Lab. These settings invite very different questions. A robotics project may focus on a machine, control process, sensor, movement condition, or interaction. A cyber question can identify a system, access pattern, threat, decision, or protective practice. Fabrication work may begin with a material, tool path, prototype, or test condition. An arts or humanities question may centre on an artefact, text, performance, archive, or act of interpretation.
The variety is useful when it helps a reader decide what kind of inquiry is needed. A prototype is not the same as a historical record, and a system log is not the same as a performance. Each requires a different way of collecting and interpreting material. A focused Tulsa question names the object before it names a broad field. It can then ask whether the object should be tested, observed, compared, modelled, documented, or interpreted. This keeps the range of research visible without pretending that every topic belongs to one method.
Tulsa centres, faculty-led work, and joint industry projects organise research settings by purpose
The University of Tulsa describes research centres and institutes, faculty-led research, consortia, and joint industry projects as distinct parts of its research and economic-development environment. It also notes that projects can develop into centres and institutes for long-term theoretical and practical work. These structures are useful for different reasons. A faculty-led route can help connect a question with a particular discipline. A centre may provide a continuing setting for a specialised problem. A joint project can identify an operating context or technical constraint. A consortium can make a shared question more visible across several organisations.
The setting should follow the research object, not determine it. A project involving an industry partner might examine one process, device, material, record, or operational decision. A theoretical question may require a model, archive, dataset, or carefully chosen set of cases. A practical question may need a fabrication test, field observation, or comparison between operating conditions. The question remains responsible for its own boundaries. At Tulsa, centres and joint projects can make work possible, but they become meaningful only after the project explains why that particular setting is necessary.
Tulsa Undergraduate Research Challenge can turn a large interest into an experiment, interpretation, or comparison
The Tulsa Undergraduate Research Challenge is described as enabling undergraduates to undertake advanced research with guidance from UTulsa professors. Guidance is most helpful when the project already has a defined unit of analysis. A robotics question could isolate one behaviour of a device. A cyber question may focus on one user action, system condition, or security decision. A humanities question might select a specific archive, text, historical period, or interpretive dispute. A Fab Lab project can specify a material property, design variation, or production step. These choices give a mentor and a researcher something concrete to discuss.
A solid plan then states what would change the interpretation. It may compare two prototype settings, two data conditions, two groups of records, two versions of an artefact, or two accounts of an event. The conclusion should remain close to the comparison. This approach does not make research smaller in ambition; it makes the route from question to result visible. University of Tulsa's laboratories, centres, faculty work, cyber and robotics settings, and industry links can then support an inquiry with a clear object and a method that fits it.
Institution record
- Country
- United States of America
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Private not for Profit
- QS size code
- S
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.