University of Utah
#540
QS World University Rankings 2026
30.5
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#540
QS World University Rankings 2026
#531
QS World University Rankings 2025
30.5
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 21.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #570
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 13.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 53.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #349
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 38.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #488
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 21.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #695
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 18.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #759
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 24.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #699
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 74.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #455
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 28.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #588
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 59.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #509
About University of Utah
University of Utah research covers culture, policy, health, technology, and environmental questions without one label
The University of Utah presents research as work that reaches across science and engineering, the arts and humanities, social work, and education. Its public research material also links discovery to culture, policy, health, and wider understanding. It gives starting orientation for a question with several dimensions, yet it cannot replace a defined research match. A health technology may involve a device, clinical workflow, information system, patient experience, ethics, and policy. An environmental question may involve a place, heat pattern, ecosystem, built system, public record, or community response. A strong search starts by deciding which object is actually central.
The university's public pages can then be used as routes toward a more local record. A researcher should name the object, the setting, and the evidence that can answer the question. The evidence might be laboratory measurements, system data, field observations, records, policy documents, interviews, images, code, designs, or a structured collection of texts. A unit or story is a closer fit only when it identifies some of the same elements. Without that connection, a shared word such as health, innovation, climate, or society is not enough. This approach makes a university-wide research description useful while keeping the conclusion anchored in what a public record actually states.
Utah's AI, bioeconomy, space, climate, health, and justice examples point to different research materials
University of Utah research material highlights areas including the BioEconomy, AI, and space, and it also points to AI-powered health tools, community-based justice programmes, and research linked to extreme heat. These examples are valuable because they demand different questions. A bioeconomy inquiry may focus on a biological resource, process, product, or environmental consequence. An AI question may focus on data, model design, evaluation, decision use, or human impact. A space-related question may be about observation, instrumentation, a physical process, or a communications system. A heat question can involve climate measurements, buildings, public health, work, energy, or local experience. Each needs its own evidence trail.
The examples should not be blended into a general claim that every university unit works on all of those subjects. Instead, use them to sharpen a search. If the interest is a health tool, ask what health problem, user group, dataset, and decision context matter. If it is justice, ask which institution, policy, community setting, or record is under study. If it is heat, name the location, period, exposure, system, or outcome. The most useful next official page will be one that connects those details to a project, group, person, or public output. A broad frontiers page can frame the landscape, but a narrow question needs a narrow record.
Follow a University of Utah public record from one stated problem toward a named project or output
The University of Utah's research site also makes policies, administrative services, research communications, and university-wide initiatives visible. These routes can be useful when they clarify the environment around a question, yet they should be read for their actual purpose. A policy page may explain expectations. A communications page can point to a visible story. An initiative may bring people together around a broad subject. None of them automatically describes a specific study or confirms a current project connection. A reader should look for the record that explains the subject, setting, and evidence in one place, then separate verified detail from a reasonable inference.
A practical University of Utah note can be built from four parts: the defined object, the real-world setting, the evidence needed, and the closest official record. For instance, a question about a digital health tool might name the task it supports, the people affected, the information it uses, and the outcome being examined. A question about heat might identify a location, measure, population, or infrastructure condition. The public material establishes a broad research environment and several named topic routes. It does not confirm that a particular person, group, or resource fits every related question. When an exact link is not visible, use the page as a direction for closer checking rather than a promise about research activity.
Institution record
- Country
- United States of America
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.