Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Vermont

United States of AmericaAmericas

#1001

QS World University Rankings 2026

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#1001

QS World University Rankings 2026

#1001

QS World University Rankings 2025

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
3.7
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
6.8
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
39.8
QS 2026 rank
#509

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
23
QS 2026 rank
#669

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
8.8
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
3.8
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
8.8
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
66.2
QS 2026 rank
#607

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
22.3
QS 2026 rank
#690

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
52
QS 2026 rank
#663
University profile

About University of Vermont

University of Vermont frames research as a public good for healthy societies and environments

University of Vermont describes research as a public good that helps shape healthy societies and a healthy environment. This statement gives a project a direction, but it does not define its object. A question about society may concern a community practice, public service, institution, policy, group, or cultural record. An environmental question can begin with a landscape condition, a water or land process, a material, an ecosystem, or a decision about use. Begin by deciding which part of the public concern is concrete enough to examine and which relationship needs explanation.

The public-good frame becomes practical when a question has a scale. A study could focus on one health service, one environmental indicator, one local policy, one set of documents, or one comparison across selected sites. It can then state what will be observed: measurements, samples, records, interviews, maps, images, or a structured case comparison. The conclusion must stay close to that material. A project may show a difference under stated conditions or describe how a group interprets a situation. It should not turn a single observation into a claim about every society or every environment.

Agriculture, medicine, nursing, engineering, education, business, and natural resources give UVM distinct routes

UVM's research pages identify work across agriculture and life sciences, arts and sciences, business, education and social services, engineering and mathematical sciences, medicine, nursing and health sciences, and environment and natural resources. These areas can meet around a complex problem, but they begin with different research materials. Agriculture may focus on a crop, soil condition, animal system, or production practice. Engineering can involve a design, component, algorithm, structure, or measurement procedure. Health work may centre on a biological mechanism, clinical pathway, service, treatment, or population outcome. Education and social services can examine a learning activity, institution, programme, policy, or lived experience.

A cross-school project needs to explain why more than one route is necessary. An environmental-health question might connect a measured condition with a defined service or community response. A business and engineering question could examine how a technical change shapes an operational decision. Agriculture and natural resources may meet around a land-use practice, ecological condition, or record of change. The connection becomes credible when the study identifies the shared object and the contribution of each approach. Without that definition, a list of colleges is only a list, not a research design.

At UVM, centres, innovation routes, and rural partnerships need a bounded question to be useful

University of Vermont makes research administration, undergraduate research, innovations, centres and institutes, the Leahy Institute for Rural Partnerships, and the Office of Engagement visible alongside its academic structure. These routes have different purposes. A centre or institute can gather sustained work around a particular issue. An innovation route can relate a design or discovery to a practical context. Rural partnerships and engagement may help clarify a community setting, local concern, or collaborative relationship. They do not decide what the study should observe or which claim it can support.

A well-formed UVM plan therefore starts with one bounded relationship. It could ask how a land condition changes across selected sites, how a health-service process is experienced by a defined group, how an educational practice shapes one activity, or how a technical design behaves under a specified condition. The plan then chooses the record that fits the question and names the comparison that will matter. With that structure in place, the university's colleges, centres, partnerships, and public-good orientation can support work that is careful about both its purpose and its limits.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.