Rhodes University
#1001
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#1001
QS World University Rankings 2026
#951
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 8
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 9.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 17.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 18.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #733
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 46.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #434
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 34.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #554
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 56.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #745
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 42.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #408
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 42.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
About Rhodes University
Rhodes University places commerce, education, humanities, law, pharmacy, and science within a common academic map
Rhodes University makes commerce, education, humanities, law, pharmacy, and science visible through its faculties and departments, alongside institutes, teaching and learning units, community engagement, libraries, and environmental sustainability activity. This range matters because a question about one place or public issue can require several forms of inquiry without making the disciplines identical. A question about a medicine may involve a compound, clinical practice, regulatory rule, community experience, or public communication. A question about the environment may concern a material, ecosystem, policy, local history, or pattern of human activity. The starting point should be the thing that needs explanation, not the broadest category that might contain it.
Rhodes University's academic map gives a reader several ways to describe that starting point. A commerce question might focus on an organisation, decision, market practice, or record. A humanities question may begin with a text, archive, language, artistic work, or historical account. A science question could involve a specimen, measurement, process, model, or field condition. These forms of work can inform each other, but they use different materials and standards of interpretation. Naming the object and setting early makes it easier to decide whether a question needs one discipline or a carefully explained connection between several.
The Rhodes Research Gateway separates governance, ethics, intellectual property, and technology transfer
Rhodes University's Research Gateway sets out research strategy, objectives, governance, ethics, intellectual property, technology transfer, policies and protocols, research foci, and research entities. These elements answer different questions. Governance and protocols concern how work is organised and carried out responsibly. Ethics matter when a question involves people or animals and requires careful treatment of participation, materials, or risk. Intellectual property and technology transfer concern what may happen when a result, method, or invention moves beyond its original research setting. A research focus or entity can show where related work is gathered, but it does not replace a clearly stated research question.
This structure is useful for turning an interest into a plan that is small enough to examine. Begin by identifying a change, relationship, or uncertainty. Then decide what would count as a meaningful observation: a document, sample, interview, image, measurement, experiment, archival record, or comparison across cases. The next question is whether the work has an ethical dimension, a policy requirement, or a need for shared facilities and expertise. Rhodes's gateway becomes more useful when these issues are connected to a defined object rather than treated as a checklist added after the question has already become too broad.
Research foci and research entities help Rhodes questions keep their real object in view
The Gateway also points to research foci, research entities, research outputs, creative outputs, strategic partnerships, and research support divisions. A reader can use these routes to distinguish a subject area from the work that makes the subject concrete. A research focus may name a wider area of attention. An entity may provide a setting where several related questions are pursued. An output can show the form a result takes, whether it is an academic finding, a creative work, or another contribution. The useful route depends on the question's material and method, not on the most familiar institutional label.
A focused Rhodes enquiry could examine a policy through documents and institutional records, an environmental condition through repeated observations, a pharmaceutical issue through a defined material and procedure, or a historical question through a bounded archive. The key is to state what will be compared or interpreted and where that work takes place. With those choices visible, the university's faculties, research foci, entities, and gateway resources can help a reader follow a specific line of inquiry without turning the wider university structure into an unsupported claim.
Institution record
- Country
- South Africa
- Region
- Africa
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- M
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.