Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Flinders University

AustraliaOceania

#387

QS World University Rankings 2026

39

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#387

QS World University Rankings 2026

#336

QS World University Rankings 2025

39

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
19.6
QS 2026 rank
#629

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
9.7
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
11.3
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
64.3
QS 2026 rank
#252

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
97.9
QS 2026 rank
#144

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
97.3
QS 2026 rank
#99

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
97.4
QS 2026 rank
#87

International research network

QS 2026 score
77.3
QS 2026 rank
#400

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
15.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
81.6
QS 2026 rank
#154
University profile

About Flinders University

Research at Flinders connects institutes, centres, and practical questions

Flinders University presents research as work that brings together different kinds of expertise with government, industry, and communities. Its public material frames that work around healthier communities, a fairer society, a resilient nation, and a sustainable world. Those are broad public directions, not separate academic disciplines. They are most useful as a way to locate a problem before looking for the institute, centre, hub, laboratory, or researcher that gives the problem a clearer home. A health question may be social as well as clinical. An environmental question may involve engineering, policy, data, or community practice. The local setting is where those differences become visible.

The university also places its institutes, centres, and hubs near the centre of its research presentation. This matters because those units can connect people who would not naturally sit in the same department. Their presence does not show that every theme has the same research design or the same set of facilities. Instead, read a unit as a possible route. Look for the current project language, the relevant experts, and the methods described in the material closest to the work. A useful comparison should explain why one local setting is appropriate for the object of study, rather than treating a broad institutional direction as a complete match.

Public examples reveal several ways research can move beyond one discipline

Flinders' research pages use current examples to show the range of activity being discussed. They include work on aged care services, indoor air quality in cooling systems, and connections between sleep research and workplace wellbeing. These examples are valuable because each one joins a specific problem with an applied context. They should not be stretched into a claim about every research group. An example about air quality may involve a different technical approach from a project on care services, even though both relate to wellbeing. Use these stories to identify vocabulary and possible research settings, then follow that vocabulary into the institute, centre, or expert profile that explains the research more fully.

The public research material also points to facilities, collaboration, and a search tool for experts. Together, these features can help turn an initial interest into a smaller evidence trail. Find the problem first, then identify an expert or unit, then check whether the public description makes the method or system visible. A laboratory resource, external partner, or public story can add context, but it should not carry the argument by itself. This sequence prevents an attractive example from becoming an assumption about the regular work of a research team. It also makes it easier to distinguish between a project that is merely related and one that shares a real research practice.

Make a Flinders research note that stays close to visible evidence

A grounded Flinders note can use three short entries. Name the research object, identify the most relevant institute, centre, hub, or expert, and describe the visible link between them. The object might be an indoor environmental condition, an ageing-related service, a sleep pattern, a health system, a technical process, or another defined subject. The link should give another reader a clear reason to see the relevance of the selected setting. It may concern a measurement method, a data source, a laboratory process, a public service context, or a way of working with external organisations. If the link only repeats a large theme, it needs more local evidence.

Finish by recording the question that remains open. Central material explains the larger research setting and identifies routes to further information, but it cannot show every detail of a current group. A centre may include several projects, and an expert profile may change as work develops. Keeping that boundary visible is useful, not hesitant. It gives the next research step a clear purpose: check the current unit material, identify the people connected with the work, and see whether the methods and research object still align. That approach produces a profile that is specific enough to compare with other universities and flexible enough to revisit when new information appears.

Institution record

Country
Australia
Region
Oceania
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.