Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Wollongong

AustraliaOceania

#184

QS World University Rankings 2026

57.5

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#184

QS World University Rankings 2026

#167

QS World University Rankings 2025

57.5

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
41.6
QS 2026 rank
#287

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
33.1
QS 2026 rank
#434

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
21.1
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
95.6
QS 2026 rank
#66

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
99.5
QS 2026 rank
#113

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
82.2
QS 2026 rank
#211

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
83.8
QS 2026 rank
#179

International research network

QS 2026 score
88.6
QS 2026 rank
#197

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
25.8
QS 2026 rank
#626

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
86.1
QS 2026 rank
#98
University profile

About University of Wollongong

Research framed around health, education, and sustainability

The University of Wollongong presents research around critical challenges in health, education, and sustainability. Its public research material also connects that work with industry, government, community, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This can help a researcher understand how the university describes the public setting around research. That framing does not show that each group operates across all three areas or with every type of partner. A focused comparison should identify the faculty, institute, laboratory, or project where the question is defined, then use the wider challenge area to understand how that local work relates to a larger concern.

UOW's research news gives examples involving health, environmental decision-making, forced displacement, social issues, and technology. These examples show that the public research landscape is not confined to one discipline. They should be treated as leads, not as a catalogue of stable expertise. A news story can highlight one outcome or moment in a project. To see whether a direction is genuinely relevant, locate the research group that explains the research object, data, field setting, or method. That step turns a broad public theme into an evidence-based assessment of a particular academic environment.

Facilities, innovation routes, and interdisciplinary programmes

The University of Wollongong makes research facilities and institutes visible alongside faculty research and research support. It also names iAccelerate, industry and commercial research, the Global Challenges Program, and international linkages. These routes point to different aspects of the university. A facility can signal a practical resource, iAccelerate can indicate an innovation setting, and the Global Challenges Program can reveal a cross-disciplinary frame. None of these labels should be used as a substitute for local research evidence. A profile needs to show which group is doing the work and why its current activity is relevant to the question being explored.

The public material also includes research that considers Indigenous knowledge and responsibilities to Country in environmental decision-making. This is an important reminder that a research topic may involve more than technical method. Questions about environment, community, health, or policy can carry cultural, ethical, and relational dimensions. Do not assume how every group approaches those dimensions. Instead, look for the research setting that names the relevant partnership, community context, or research practice. A careful comparison should show what is visible on a current page and avoid turning one example into a statement about the whole university.

Test a Wollongong research path through local evidence

For the University of Wollongong, begin with a problem that has a clear scale. It may concern an individual, community, ecosystem, technology, policy setting, or material process. Next, identify the closest faculty, institute, research facility, programme, or group. Add one detail that shows how the problem is being studied. The detail could be a field method, a laboratory technique, a model, a policy analysis, a community partnership, or a design process. This makes it easier to separate a genuine connection from a broad overlap in language around sustainability, health, or social change.

Keep the broader UOW research framework in the background of the note. It can explain why a local project may be connected with a larger challenge, but the local group must carry the strongest evidence. Write down any uncertainty about the current project, research team, or method instead of filling it with a general conclusion. That makes the profile practical to update as researchers publish new material or shift focus. It also gives a fair basis for comparing Wollongong with another university that may use similar public language while organising research in a different way.

Institution record

Country
Australia
Region
Oceania
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.