University of Namur
#801
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#801
QS World University Rankings 2026
Not listed
QS World University Rankings 2025
Not listed
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 6.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 8.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 5.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 44.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #421
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 37.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #521
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 59.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #345
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 62.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #316
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 47.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 10.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 53.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #632
About University of Namur
Research at the University of Namur
The University of Namur's research page presents research as a system of institutes, technology platforms, faculties, and support services. It describes teams that bring together academic, scientific, administrative, and technical staff, including people from Belgium and other countries. The page attributes research strategy to the Board of Directors, with advice from its Research Council. For a prospective applicant, this is useful context because it shows where an institutional research question may sit, but it is not evidence that every institute works on every related topic. The nearer source is still the named institute, faculty, project, or supervisor page.
The same page gives a current picture of the scale of the research environment. Its figures section gives two counts: 11 research institutes and 11 technology platforms. It separately reports 22 spin-offs and a 2024 research and development budget of 30.3 million euros. These figures describe the university's institutional inventory, not confirmed access to a particular facility or project. For a strong shortlist record, note the specific platform or institute connected to the proposed work and then verify its equipment, participation rules, research staff, and current activity.
Doctoral study across seven faculties
UNamur's PhD information says that doctoral study is offered in all seven faculties. The university's public list spans areas such as philosophy and letters, law, economics and management, information and communication, computer science, science, medicine, and education. The list is a useful way to see the range of doctoral homes, but a faculty label by itself cannot show that one particular project is currently open or that a researcher is available to supervise it. Applicants need to move from the degree category to the department, research institute, and named academic work that matches their question.
The same page reports that more than 300 students enrol each year. That number helps describe the doctoral community at institutional level, while the research page adds information about researcher training and mobility. Together, the pages suggest a path in which a doctoral applicant should examine both the academic setting and the services around research. They do not replace the current doctoral registration information, research proposal requirements, or a direct check with the relevant faculty.
How to assess a Namur research fit
A useful Namur shortlist entry starts with a defined object and a clear place for the evidence. A computer-science question might specify a system, dataset, or comparison. A life-science question may need a sample, experiment, field observation, or imaging record. A policy or communication question could use documents, interviews, administrative data, or a bounded comparison. The university's list of faculties and institutes can help locate a neighbourhood for the question, but it cannot decide whether the proposed method is feasible or whether a particular researcher is working on it now.
Before treating the university as a serious application option, record the relevant faculty, institute, platform, project, and potential supervisor, then confirm each item on the current official page. Note what is known and what still needs a direct check. The research page is most useful for understanding the institutional map and available support, while the PhD page helps identify the possible doctoral home. This separation keeps a broad research profile informative without turning it into an unsupported promise about admission, funding, supervision, or equipment access.
Institution record
- Country
- Belgium
- Region
- Europe
- QS size code
- M
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.