QS ranking profile
Carleton University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #781
- Down 40 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #741
- Overall score
- Not published
Explore opportunities at Carleton University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#701 worldwide
#701 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#743 worldwide
#756 worldwide
#364 worldwide
#489 worldwide
#443 worldwide
#407 worldwide
#477 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Comprehensive
- Teaches across all main faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Americas
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Carleton University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Carleton brings sustainability, wellness, and connectivity into a research map with distinct questions
Carleton University presents sustainability, wellness, and connectivity as three research strengths within a wider interdisciplinary setting. Those names help distinguish questions that begin with very different objects. Sustainability can concern a natural or built environment, climate change, a public policy, or the consequences of a technical design. Wellness can concern physical health, mental health, culture, economic conditions, or the way people experience a service. Connectivity can concern a community relationship, a digital system, an organisation, or a link between people and place. These areas can meet in one topic, but they should not be treated as one method or one research object.
The university also describes research in relation to collaboration, equity, diversity, inclusion, and reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples. Those ideas matter when a question involves people, communities, or the public use of knowledge. A reader interested in environmental monitoring, health, design, or social connection can begin by asking what actually changes and who encounters that change. The answer may be a measured condition, a service, a device, a policy, a local setting, or a shared experience. Naming that object gives a broad interest a clearer direction and makes it easier to recognize work that is genuinely related rather than only nearby in language.
Wildfire smoke, skin grafts, and senior isolation show Carleton research at different scales
Recent Carleton research stories show how different the university's public questions can be. One team examines how wildfire smoke affects air and health through modelling, environmental monitoring, and health data. Another engineering story concerns personalised skin grafts for epidermolysis bullosa. A community-focused item considers senior isolation and healthier, more connected, and inclusive communities. These examples do not form one generic health or technology theme. The wildfire-smoke work begins with environmental conditions and their effects. The skin-graft work begins with a medical and engineering problem. The senior-isolation work begins with relationships, participation, and community life. Each calls for a different setting, material, and way of making sense of findings.
This distinction can help a reader turn a large interest into a workable question. A question about air quality might focus on particulate conditions, a prediction, public communication, or a health outcome. A question about biomedical engineering might focus on a material, a design, a biological interaction, or a clinical context. A question about social isolation might focus on a program, a neighbourhood, a pattern of participation, or a person's account of everyday life. The theme alone does not decide the work. A more useful starting point is to state the phenomenon, the place where it matters, and the observation that could make a difference visible.
Carleton's research routes make a focused enquiry easier to frame with care
Carleton's research area separates work with partners, international initiatives, research ethics, licensing and development, and stories from across the university. These routes describe different parts of academic activity. A partner connection may matter when a question reaches a community, public body, or organisation. Ethics matters when people, sensitive information, or potentially harmful consequences are involved. An international connection may matter when comparison across places or institutions is central to the question. A research story can introduce a current example, but it does not replace a careful account of the problem being examined.
A useful Carleton search can therefore start with a short sentence that names an object, a setting, and a change. It might concern smoke in a particular environment, a material used in a health setting, a digital tool in a public service, or a form of social connection in a neighbourhood. Then ask what could be examined there: measurements, images, records, designs, interviews, observations, documents, or a designed comparison. This approach keeps sustainability, wellness, and connectivity connected to concrete questions. It also leaves room for work that crosses fields while making clear why each field is needed for the particular problem.