Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Queen's University, Ontario

Canada Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#191
Up 2 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#193
Overall score
56.8
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Queen's University, Ontario

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 50.9

#219 worldwide

Employer reputation 75.7

#123 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 7.9

#801 worldwide

Citations per faculty 56.3

#315 worldwide

International faculty ratio 75.6

#315 worldwide

International student ratio 35.5

#536 worldwide

International student diversity 41.2

#496 worldwide

International research network 79

#369 worldwide

Employment outcomes 92.3

#87 worldwide

Sustainability 86.6

#93 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Large
About 12,000 to 30,000 students
Subject range
Focused
Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Americas
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Queen's University, Ontario

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Queen's University, Ontario combines a Kingston setting with a broad research community

Queen's University, Ontario is based in Kingston, with a main campus that includes historic buildings, contemporary centres for art and culture, classrooms, residences, and other shared spaces. Location and physical setting can help a reader understand the place in which an academic community works, but they do not establish a research fit by themselves. The more useful research map comes from the university's description of work across humanities and social sciences, health and medicine, natural sciences, and engineering. A question may cross these areas in several ways. A health issue can involve clinical, social, technical, or policy work. A materials question can connect physical science, engineering, environmental systems, or design. The research setting becomes clear only when a local institute, school, or group describes its own object of study and research practice.

Queen's research material emphasizes discovery, partnerships, and several disciplinary routes

Research material at Queen's describes collaboration among researchers, communities, governments, and industry, and it highlights work ranging from humanities and social sciences to health, medicine, natural sciences, engineering, materials, and research institutes. This range can help someone locate an initial route into a problem. It cannot show that all groups work with identical partners or research practices. A collaboration page may show a broad institutional direction, while a local project page will explain what is actually being investigated. When a topic seems relevant, find the closest institute, faculty, researcher, or centre and ask what the page identifies as the evidence. It might be laboratory results, field data, clinical material, policy records, interviews, archival sources, technical prototypes, or another form of research work.

Compare Queen's through the research object, not through a general reputation

For Queen's University, Ontario, begin a comparison with a concrete question. Write down the system, material, population, historical record, technology, or public issue that needs investigation. Next, locate the academic setting where that object is discussed. A broad research theme is a useful signpost, but the local page should explain whether the group works through experiments, modelling, data analysis, community research, design, clinical inquiry, or another method. This approach avoids a common mistake: treating the presence of a large research community as proof that every nearby question has the same academic home. The profile becomes more useful when it identifies a real setting and the visible work taking place there.

A short recheck step improves the note. Research projects can evolve, people can move between roles, and a centre may host many lines of work at once. Use the central material to find likely paths, then return to the nearest group or school page when the topic becomes important. The final comparison should say what the research object is, where it sits, and how the public material describes the work. It can leave broader institutional context in place without making it evidence for one named project.

Kingston provides the physical setting for this search, while the relevant academic unit provides the research detail. Keeping those roles separate avoids overreading a campus description. The profile is most useful when it helps a reader find a current research community and state clearly why its work is related to the question being considered.