Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Saskatchewan

CanadaAmericas

#378

QS World University Rankings 2026

39.6

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#378

QS World University Rankings 2026

#340

QS World University Rankings 2025

39.6

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
16
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
10.2
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
21.1
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
71.9
QS 2026 rank
#201

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
82.4
QS 2026 rank
#276

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
65.4
QS 2026 rank
#305

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
68.7
QS 2026 rank
#280

International research network

QS 2026 score
77.3
QS 2026 rank
#397

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
44.3
QS 2026 rank
#396

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
83.6
QS 2026 rank
#131
University profile

About University of Saskatchewan

Saskatchewan identifies research directions tied to place and systems

University of Saskatchewan highlights water and food security, vaccine development and infectious diseases, and human, animal, and environmental health in its public material. These directions provide a useful first orientation because they connect research with systems that can be studied from several angles. Water security may involve hydrology, agriculture, public policy, or engineering. Health may involve biological mechanisms, communities, animals, environments, or a combination. The central themes are therefore routes into a search. The local group or researcher page is needed to show which object, method, and evidence define the work in a particular setting.

The research site also presents Signature Areas of Research and describes them as areas of scholarly and artistic work shaped by capacity, history, investment, and sense of place. This language is important because it signals that a visible theme may be connected to a particular regional or institutional context. It does not explain every project within the area. When a theme appears relevant, look for the research group that specifies the question being asked. Then check whether the public description shows a method or research environment that genuinely overlaps with your own direction.

Researcher profiles and groups provide the closest useful evidence

USask makes researcher profiles, research groups, research expertise, publications, news, and feature material available through its research pages. These resources have different strengths. A researcher profile can identify a focused line of inquiry, a group can show a shared setting, and a publication or feature can reveal vocabulary or a recent result. None should be made to do the work of the others. A research comparison is strongest when the person or group establishes the central question and another source helps clarify the approach or current context.

The university also presents research through creativity, collaboration, and a commitment to challenges that extend beyond one discipline. This is useful background, particularly for work involving agriculture, health, environment, or communities. It does not create an automatic link between a broad concern and a specific project. Keep the evidence trail narrow. Name the unit, the research object, and the method that is visible. If a connection depends on a resource or partnership, find the local page that shows how it relates to the actual work rather than relying only on central language.

Use a USask signature area as a route, not a final answer

A University of Saskatchewan profile is most useful when it turns a signature area into a concrete question. A food-security interest might concern crop science, nutrition, agricultural economics, data, or policy. A health interest might concern infection, vaccine development, a human or animal population, or environmental conditions. Locate the relevant researcher or group and then look for the method that joins the local work to your question. This could be laboratory research, field observation, modelling, data analysis, community work, or another clearly described approach.

Write the final note with a clear boundary around what the official pages establish. The central research map shows the directions that are publicly visible. A local profile or group description is needed to determine whether a particular question is a real fit. Record any missing detail instead of treating a broad theme as certainty. This provides a stable basis for comparison and makes room for current research pages to refine the picture later.

Institution record

Country
Canada
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.