Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

University of Basel

Switzerland Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#158
Down 27 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#131
Overall score
61.3
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at University of Basel

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 34

#357 worldwide

Employer reputation 20.7

#639 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 70.2

#229 worldwide

Citations per faculty 94.2

#80 worldwide

International faculty ratio 100

#47 worldwide

International student ratio 91.4

#156 worldwide

International student diversity 68

#284 worldwide

International research network 90.4

#170 worldwide

Employment outcomes 74.9

#183 worldwide

Sustainability 88.4

#74 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Medium
About 5,000 to 12,000 students
Subject range
Focused
Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Europe
QS regional grouping

University profile

About University of Basel

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

University of Basel combines broad disciplines with research support for digital work

The University of Basel describes itself as a comprehensive university with work across the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, and medicine. Its mission material also connects research with teaching, public responsibility, and collaboration. This gives a useful broad map, especially for questions that move between social and scientific evidence. It does not show the method used by every research setting. A broad disciplinary range can contain very different approaches to the same issue. To compare research carefully, find the faculty, institute, laboratory, or service page that states the problem, materials, data, or research practice in concrete terms.

The university's Research and Infrastructure Support service gives a more focused view of one kind of practice. It supports researchers in the humanities and social sciences working with digital methods and data, including planning, analysis, presentation, and open ways of sharing research outputs. This is useful evidence that research support can matter as much as a department title. A question involving texts, records, images, spatial data, or digital collections may need both a scholarly home and technical support. The local project still determines whether those resources are relevant to a particular piece of work.

Digital data work at Basel can be understood as a research practice

The Basel RISE page describes support for computer-based research, data modelling, visualization, digitisation, research data management, and methods for sharing results. These are not interchangeable skills. A project using archival documents may need digitisation and annotation. A social research project may need data organization and analysis. A public-facing project may need clear presentation and accessible outputs. Rather than assuming that a digital label means the same thing everywhere, identify which of these practices appears on the relevant group's own page. That makes it possible to compare the real research workflow rather than only the university's general capacity.

This also helps readers distinguish infrastructure from intellectual direction. A support service can make a type of research possible, but it does not define the questions that each scholar or group chooses to pursue. The final research fit may depend on a faculty member's topic, an institute's archive, a laboratory's tool, or a collaboration's dataset. Record the relationship precisely. For example, a project may use digital methods to study cultural material, social change, health data, or environmental records. The important detail is how the method serves the particular research object, not simply that digital support exists.

Compare University of Basel research through question, method, and support

A useful University of Basel note begins with the question a reader wants to investigate. Next, identify the academic home that appears closest to it. Then describe the kind of evidence or method visible in the official source. A question might be explored through laboratory research, clinical material, cultural records, interviews, digital data, or a combination of approaches. The university's broad mission and research-support pages can show where to start, but they should not be used to claim that every setting provides the same route. Local pages are needed to confirm the current group, the research practice, and the specific form of evidence.

Keep the note revisable. Support services may add new tools, research groups may change projects, and institutional language can cover many distinct activities. A comparison becomes more reliable when it says what is visible and what remains to be checked. Basel's public pages are particularly helpful for a reader considering work that links a disciplinary question with digital data or research infrastructure. The final assessment should rest on a current local source that makes the relationship between question, evidence, method, and academic setting clear enough to test.