QS ranking profile
University of Lausanne
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #212
- Up 12 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #224
- Overall score
- 54.6
Explore opportunities at University of Lausanne
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#322 worldwide
#340 worldwide
#393 worldwide
#223 worldwide
#97 worldwide
#296 worldwide
#415 worldwide
#286 worldwide
#264 worldwide
#313 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Full comprehensive
- All main faculty areas, including a medical school
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Lausanne
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Seven faculties create a broad starting map for research at Lausanne
The University of Lausanne, often called UNIL, presents research across seven faculties covering theology and religious studies, law and public administration, arts and humanities, social and political sciences, business and economics, geosciences and environment, and biology and medicine. Its public pages also describe work in areas as different as genetics, the aesthetics of cinema, environmental law, and forensic science. This range shows why a university name is only the beginning of a research search. A topic about environment may belong to geoscience, law, economics, social research, or a combination of them. A health question can involve biology, medicine, data, ethics, or public institutions. The clearest next source is the unit where the relevant object, evidence, and method are described together.
The university's current news gives another view of that breadth. A new interdisciplinary initiative on the origins of life brings chemistry, geology, astronomy, and biology into contact. Other public stories connect sports with environmental assessment or bring students from different faculties together around a shared social challenge. These examples show different forms of collaboration, from a scientific question about living matter to a public concern about the environmental effects of major events. They should be used as examples of research activity, not as a claim that every field follows the same model. The local centre, laboratory, or project remains the place to confirm the substance of a particular question.
Interdisciplinary centres add a clear route across faculty boundaries
UNIL identifies several interdisciplinary centres, including the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mountain Research, the Interdisciplinary Centre for Sports Research, the Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics Research, and the Centre for Life Course Research. It also takes part in national research hubs concerned with life-course research and microbiomes. These structures are valuable because they offer a visible bridge between faculty-based work and questions that require more than one discipline. Mountain research can bring environmental science, geography, policy, and communities into contact. Sports research can involve social, health, environmental, or economic evidence. Ethics research can examine issues raised by medicine, technology, law, or public life.
The centres should still be read with care. An interdisciplinary label does not tell a reader what a particular project measures or how a claim is supported. A sports question may use surveys, archival material, environmental data, interviews, or policy documents. A microbiome question may use biological samples and computational analysis. A life-course question may follow social or health evidence over time. The university's research pages make these centres easy to discover, but a careful comparison follows the route further to a named project or group. That is where the specific research design and current work become visible.
Open science and research support provide context around the local work
The University of Lausanne also makes research support visible through researcher directories, its institutional repository, thesis information, open-access resources, guidance on ethics and professional conduct, research-data practices, and services for collaboration. These routes show that research lives within a wider framework of documentation, responsible conduct, and sharing. A directory may help identify a researcher. A repository may help locate publications. A thesis catalogue can show completed work. Guidance on data and professional conduct can clarify the environment around research. None of these resources, however, can replace a local source that explains the question and method of a current project.
For UNIL, a useful research note combines the two levels. Start with a concrete question, then identify the faculty, centre, laboratory, or project that directly addresses it. State what evidence it uses and how the interdisciplinary or research-support structure adds context. Keep any uncertainty visible: a centre may fit a topic while the current project is not clear, or a repository item may show earlier work rather than a present activity. UNIL's public material offers a rich route through faculties, centres, research infrastructure, and open-science resources. Following the details allows a reader to assess a research setting with care rather than relying on broad descriptions.