Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Aix-Marseille University

FranceEurope

#428

QS World University Rankings 2026

35.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#428

QS World University Rankings 2026

#481

QS World University Rankings 2025

35.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
51
QS 2026 rank
#218

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
15.9
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
11
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
29.7
QS 2026 rank
#591

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
22.8
QS 2026 rank
#678

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
29
QS 2026 rank
#604

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
21.7
QS 2026 rank
#734

International research network

QS 2026 score
99
QS 2026 rank
#15

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
29
QS 2026 rank
#571

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
63.2
QS 2026 rank
#436
University profile

About Aix-Marseille University

Aix-Marseille University's five campuses are part of a wider Mediterranean research setting

Aix-Marseille University was created in 2012 through the merger of three universities in the region. Its public overview places 84,000 students across five campuses and identifies seventeen schools, faculties, and institutes. That history matters because it explains why a search can begin in more than one setting: the university's public map includes teaching, research, innovation, international activity, and a network of institutes rather than one narrow disciplinary route. A Mediterranean setting is part of the university's own description, but it should be treated as context, not as proof that every project addresses the same regional question.

The same overview names twenty-one establishment institutes, twenty-two international laboratories, and more than 2,500 teacher-researchers. These figures show institutional breadth, while the labels point to different kinds of evidence. An institute can indicate a durable theme or organisational setting. A laboratory can be a closer route to equipment, methods, and current work. A university-wide page cannot settle the subject of a particular team. The useful next move is to locate the named unit closest to the object being studied and then read its own public record.

Thirty-five IUT research units make disciplinary overlap visible

The Aix-Marseille University Institute of Technology offers a more detailed view of how research can cross a conventional faculty boundary. Its research page says that its teacher-researchers work in thirty-five university research units across twenty-eight CNU sections. The page places that work across science and technology, environment, health, economics, law, humanities, and social sciences. It also reports a distribution that includes mechanical engineering, thermics, electricity and chemistry, economics and management, mathematics and computing, chemistry and biology, information science, law, physics, and humanities. This is useful evidence of range, not a reason to assume that every IUT researcher works across all of those areas.

Several named settings make the map more concrete. The IUT identifies CRET-LOG, the Conception Bio-Inspirée team, and a non-destructive testing branch of the Laboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique. It also refers to the university's mechanics and engineering institute, Marseille Imaging, and AMUTECH. A logistics question, a bio-inspired design problem, an imaging task, or a materials-inspection question would therefore need different local records and different kinds of evidence. The unit names help a reader move beyond a broad phrase such as technology or innovation and ask what is actually being examined.

An AMU search becomes more useful when it starts with a named research unit

At Aix-Marseille University, a focused inquiry can begin with the thing that needs explanation. It may be a coastal process, an image, a transport system, a material, a biological mechanism, a legal question, an economic practice, or a cultural record. The next step is to identify the material that could answer it: a specimen, measurement, image set, model, document, interview, survey, field observation, or dataset. That small amount of precision makes the public institute and laboratory map practical. It narrows a large university into a search for a unit whose stated work is close to the same object and evidence.

The final description should stay at the scale of the available page. The university overview supports statements about campuses, institutes, laboratories, and the general research ecosystem. The IUT page supports a more specific account of its listed units and subject spread. Neither page identifies a live project, a particular scholar's involvement, or a method absent from its own description. A profile becomes more reliable when it marks that boundary clearly. It gives readers a useful route into AMU without turning a structural map into a promise about a particular research match.

Institution record

Country
France
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
XL
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.