QS ranking profile
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #339
- Down 4 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #335
- Overall score
- 42.2
Explore opportunities at Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#470 worldwide
#234 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#61 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#776 worldwide
#734 worldwide
#550 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Medium
- About 5,000 to 12,000 students
- Subject range
- Full comprehensive
- All main faculty areas, including a medical school
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Asia
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
IIT Roorkee presents a research map through academic units and shared resources
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, commonly called IITR, makes several routes visible on its central site: academic programmes, departments, centres, a school, research activity, library services, facilities, and institutional administration. This is useful for a prospective researcher because a university-wide menu answers different questions at different levels. A department can show a disciplinary home. A centre can indicate a more focused setting. A facility or library can point to infrastructure, while a research page may reveal a current theme or project. Taken together, these routes form a navigation system; they do not show that every topic appears in every part of IITR.
The institute's doctoral academic material names fields that range from water resources, hydrology, earth sciences, and earthquake engineering to data science, photonics, renewable energy, biosciences, materials, computing, and design. The list is a broad orientation tool, not a statement about a particular laboratory or supervisor. A question about a river system, for example, may lead toward a different unit from a question about a sensor, algorithm, material, or built environment. The practical value of the list is that it gives a reader precise starting language for locating the closest department, centre, or public research record.
The SRIC page separates research administration from the research itself
IITR's Sponsored Research and Industrial Consultancy office describes sponsored research and industrial consultancy as parts of the institute's research and development activity. Its page says that the office provides administrative and accounting assistance to faculty carrying out this work, and that it liaises with industry and government organisations while providing intellectual-property assistance. This helps explain one layer of the research environment: a university may have an office that helps research activity move through institutional processes without that office defining the scientific question or method of a particular team.
For an applicant, the distinction matters because an administrative office is not the same as a research group. The SRIC description can suggest that externally connected work has an institutional route at IITR. It cannot establish that a given subject has an active project, a particular partner, or a place for a new researcher. Start instead with the object being studied, such as a water process, a physical material, a computing problem, or an engineering system. Then find the IITR unit that publicly names that object and examine how it describes the evidence, equipment, data, or practice involved.
IIT Roorkee department and centre pages identify a relevant setting for evidence review
A careful IITR note begins with a defined problem rather than a wide label such as engineering or technology. Write down the phenomenon, system, material, data source, or social setting that needs to be examined. Next, record the kind of evidence the question needs: field measurements, experiments, models, code, images, samples, documents, or another visible form. This makes the academic map easier to use. A reader can compare that evidence with the language on a department or centre page instead of relying on a title alone. It also makes clear when two nearby subjects need different research settings.
The final step is to look for the most local public description available. A central IITR page can show that departments, centres, academic programmes, and research services exist. It cannot settle questions about current work within a small group. A specific local page may name a research topic, a laboratory, a public project, or an area of practice. If it does not, leave the connection open rather than completing it with assumptions. That approach keeps an IITR profile useful for exploration while keeping its claims close to what the public record actually shows.