Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)

IndiaAsia

#339

QS World University Rankings 2026

42.2

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#339

QS World University Rankings 2026

#335

QS World University Rankings 2025

42.2

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
26.8
QS 2026 rank
#470

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
52.2
QS 2026 rank
#234

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
9.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
96.6
QS 2026 rank
#61

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
2
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
3.6
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
7.8
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
54.5
QS 2026 rank
#776

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
19.5
QS 2026 rank
#734

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
57.5
QS 2026 rank
#550
University profile

About Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)

IIT Roorkee presents a research map through academic units and shared resources

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, commonly called IITR, makes several routes visible on its central site: academic programmes, departments, centres, a school, research activity, library services, facilities, and institutional administration. This is useful for a prospective researcher because a university-wide menu answers different questions at different levels. A department can show a disciplinary home. A centre can indicate a more focused setting. A facility or library can point to infrastructure, while a research page may reveal a current theme or project. Taken together, these routes form a navigation system; they do not show that every topic appears in every part of IITR.

The institute's doctoral academic material names fields that range from water resources, hydrology, earth sciences, and earthquake engineering to data science, photonics, renewable energy, biosciences, materials, computing, and design. The list is a broad orientation tool, not a statement about a particular laboratory or supervisor. A question about a river system, for example, may lead toward a different unit from a question about a sensor, algorithm, material, or built environment. The practical value of the list is that it gives a reader precise starting language for locating the closest department, centre, or public research record.

The SRIC page separates research administration from the research itself

IITR's Sponsored Research and Industrial Consultancy office describes sponsored research and industrial consultancy as parts of the institute's research and development activity. Its page says that the office provides administrative and accounting assistance to faculty carrying out this work, and that it liaises with industry and government organisations while providing intellectual-property assistance. This helps explain one layer of the research environment: a university may have an office that helps research activity move through institutional processes without that office defining the scientific question or method of a particular team.

For an applicant, the distinction matters because an administrative office is not the same as a research group. The SRIC description can suggest that externally connected work has an institutional route at IITR. It cannot establish that a given subject has an active project, a particular partner, or a place for a new researcher. Start instead with the object being studied, such as a water process, a physical material, a computing problem, or an engineering system. Then find the IITR unit that publicly names that object and examine how it describes the evidence, equipment, data, or practice involved.

IIT Roorkee department and centre pages identify a relevant setting for evidence review

A careful IITR note begins with a defined problem rather than a wide label such as engineering or technology. Write down the phenomenon, system, material, data source, or social setting that needs to be examined. Next, record the kind of evidence the question needs: field measurements, experiments, models, code, images, samples, documents, or another visible form. This makes the academic map easier to use. A reader can compare that evidence with the language on a department or centre page instead of relying on a title alone. It also makes clear when two nearby subjects need different research settings.

The final step is to look for the most local public description available. A central IITR page can show that departments, centres, academic programmes, and research services exist. It cannot settle questions about current work within a small group. A specific local page may name a research topic, a laboratory, a public project, or an area of practice. If it does not, leave the connection open rather than completing it with assumptions. That approach keeps an IITR profile useful for exploration while keeping its claims close to what the public record actually shows.

Institution record

Country
India
Region
Asia
Status
Public
QS size code
M
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.