Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Symbiosis International (Deemed University)

India Private not for Profit

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#696
Down 55 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#641
Overall score
25.2
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Symbiosis International (Deemed University)

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 9.2

#701 worldwide

Employer reputation 94.7

#51 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 26.5

#704 worldwide

Citations per faculty 3.3

#801 worldwide

International faculty ratio 23.3

#673 worldwide

International student ratio 16.1

#796 worldwide

International student diversity 20.4

#757 worldwide

International research network 29.4

#801 worldwide

Employment outcomes 8.9

#801 worldwide

Sustainability 45.6

#801 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Large
About 12,000 to 30,000 students
Subject range
Comprehensive
Teaches across all main faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Asia
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Symbiosis International (Deemed University)

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Symbiosis International brings law, management, technology, and health together

Symbiosis International (Deemed University) describes doctoral and research activity through faculties of law, management, computer studies, medical and health sciences, media and communication, humanities and social sciences, and engineering. This structure gives an applicant several possible academic homes, but it also makes the school and faculty important. A question about digital health may cross computer studies and medical sciences; a question about regulation may sit in law, management, or a social-science unit. Begin with the question, then trace it through the relevant school, programme, and supervisor page that can support the method.

The university operates constituent institutes in more than one location, so campus context should be kept with the academic unit. The research pages describe doctoral supervisors, research committees, central instrumentation, health-skills laboratories, and a small-animal facility. Those resources may matter for a biomedical, behavioural, engineering, or health project, but a facility name does not establish that a specific project is available. The relevant school and research group must be identified before a route is added to a working shortlist.

SIU research centres cover waste, stem cells, AI, climate, and urban studies

Symbiosis lists centres for advanced legal studies, waste-resource management, stem-cell research, nanoscience and nanotechnology, medical image analysis, behavioural studies, applied artificial intelligence, international higher education, climate change and sustainability, urban studies, Ambedkar studies, media and creative industries, and vaccines and biologicals. The centres show how a question can move across conventional faculties. Waste research may need engineering and public policy; medical imaging may combine computing, medicine, and image data; climate or urban work needs a place, system, population, or policy setting.

The Centre for Research and Innovation supports research administration and doctoral activity, while faculty research committees connect projects with supervisors. These organisational layers should be separated from a particular research topic. A project may produce a dataset, legal analysis, clinical observation, device, media study, or social-science result. The proposed output helps identify which school and centre are genuinely relevant.

A practical way to compare a Symbiosis International route

Define the object before choosing a faculty. Law needs a rule, court, institution, or policy. Management requires an organisation, market, process, or decision. Computer studies needs a dataset, software system, model, or security setting. Health and medicine require a population, sample, clinic, outcome, or laboratory method. Engineering should name a material, device, process, or measurement. Media and humanities work should specify the text, platform, audience, language, or cultural setting.

This page gives general context about Symbiosis International and cannot judge one institute, programme, centre, or supervisor. Keep the SIU shortlist entry anchored to its institute and campus; add your question, method, study language, expected result, and route page. Keep the centre directory as orientation; confirm any project through the relevant institute's own page before relying on it. Classify the study as laboratory, computational, clinical, legal, field-based, media-based, or organisational. Note the participant group, instrument, dataset, clinic, archive, or external partner needed for the design before treating the topic as a workable path.

A useful comparison also records how the proposed work would be evaluated. A legal or policy study might produce an interpretation or framework; a computing study might produce a model or tested system; a health project might produce a measured outcome; and an engineering study might produce a prototype or validated process. Keeping the expected output beside the research question makes it easier to compare institutes without turning a broad centre description into a promise about a particular project.