QS ranking profile
University of Delhi
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #328
- No change since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #328
- Overall score
- 42.6
Explore opportunities at University of Delhi
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#248 worldwide
#319 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#403 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#294 worldwide
#30 worldwide
#297 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Full comprehensive
- All main faculty areas, including a medical school
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Asia
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Delhi
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
A large academic map requires a clear research starting point
University of Delhi makes a wide academic structure visible through faculties, departments, centres and institutes, colleges, libraries, and campus resources. Its public research navigation separates the Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Council, research profile, institutional human ethics committee, intellectual property routes, prevention of plagiarism, thesis repository, research opportunities, technology transfer, major research areas, and academic-integrity guidance. These links are useful because they show that research has several layers: a disciplinary home, an institutional process, an ethical framework, and sometimes an external route for knowledge transfer. They do not tell a reader which department or research group is the right place for a particular question.
The faculty listing also shows the range of possible academic homes. It includes arts, science, law, commerce and business studies, education, management studies, music, interdisciplinary and applied sciences, and many departments within those areas. A topic involving environmental change, social policy, language, physics, health, or data should not be matched to the university only through a broad keyword. The stronger approach is to find the department or centre that names the field and then identify the research object, evidence, and current activity it makes visible. The central map helps organise that search; it cannot complete it on its own.
The Research Council links research activity with innovation and partnership
University of Delhi's Research Council describes work around university-industry connections, incubation, innovation, entrepreneurship, intellectual property, research facilities, and research and development cells. The council presents itself as a bridge between academic work and outside organisations. This can be relevant when a question depends on technology transfer, a prototype, a research facility, an organisational partner, or an intellectual-property process. It should still be treated as a support and coordination route rather than proof that every department follows the same pathway. The academic unit responsible for the research question is where the details of methods, data, participants, and ongoing projects need to be checked.
The council also highlights guidance on intellectual-property protection and the movement of university-generated technologies into wider use. That is a concrete institutional feature, but it describes a possible route after or alongside research rather than a field of research by itself. A person comparing a project should ask whether the core work is scientific, social, technical, cultural, educational, or policy-related before deciding whether the council's innovation role is central. The distinction matters. A research group may use a laboratory or archive without seeking external transfer, while another group may focus on a problem whose value depends on a partnership or practical implementation.
Trace a Delhi research question from department to institutional support
Create a University of Delhi evidence note by describing one question in ordinary language and locating its closest faculty, department, centre, or institute. Add a specific research object such as a material, environmental system, text collection, social group, health condition, legal issue, educational setting, or technical process. Next, record which central route is genuinely relevant: the ethics committee, a research facility, the thesis repository, the Research Council, academic-integrity guidance, or technology transfer. This gives a clear division between the academic work and the services that may support it. It also prevents institutional navigation from being mistaken for a detailed account of a research programme.
Keep one question open at the end. A department may match the topic but not show the current project or research team. A support route may be available without clarifying how it is used in the local setting. That is a useful gap to investigate rather than a reason to add unsupported claims. University of Delhi's public material provides a broad academic map and a visible set of research processes. A careful comparison moves through that map in order, from the discipline and research object to the appropriate institutional support, while preserving the distinctions between them.