Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Brescia

ItalyEurope

#650

QS World University Rankings 2026

26.7

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#650

QS World University Rankings 2026

#691

QS World University Rankings 2025

26.7

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
7.3
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
4.1
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
8.7
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
85
QS 2026 rank
#124

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
2
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
8.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
14.2
QS 2026 rank
#801

International research network

QS 2026 score
58.8
QS 2026 rank
#710

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
11.6
QS 2026 rank
#801

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
63.9
QS 2026 rank
#425
University profile

About University of Brescia

At Brescia, researcher expertise, outputs, facilities, and centres are separate public research routes

The University of Brescia research navigation distinguishes Expertise&Skills of UniBS Researchers, the OpenBS research output archive, research facilities, research centres, departments, and the Ethics Committee for University Research. This matters because each route documents something different. An expertise listing may help locate people or areas of knowledge. An output archive can make published work visible. A facility page may describe a technical setting. A centre or department page can indicate an organisational home. An ethics route concerns the responsible conditions around research. Treating these records as separate sources of context is more reliable than assuming that one label confirms a full project, method, or outcome.

The university also lists the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery alongside departments, libraries, and a Language Teaching Centre in its wider structure. Those public categories can help a reader sort a question by its likely setting, but they do not identify a specific line of inquiry on their own. A health question may concern biological material, clinical practice, service records, population data, ethics, or communication. A language question can involve texts, speech, learning, translation, or institutional use. The evidence needed changes with the phenomenon. A good Brescia search should therefore start from the object being examined, not only from the most familiar faculty name.

Brescia's research map also separates public engagement from technical and scholarly records

The public navigation includes research and technology transfer, civic engagement, public engagement, commitment to the territory, international networks, and a research observatory. These names suggest several ways research can meet organisations and communities beyond a department. They identify types of links, not a statement that every project creates identical external outcomes. A technology-transfer record can concern a process of moving knowledge or a technical result beyond its original setting. Civic or public engagement may describe a different relationship with people, place, or public discussion. An international-network page may identify a connection, but it does not necessarily explain the research question carried through that connection.

This separation helps with topics that have both practical and analytical parts. A question about a medical device, environmental measurement, industrial process, public policy, or cultural activity may involve experiments, records, designs, rules, users, institutions, or local conditions. It is important to identify which of those elements a public page actually describes. A facilities page might clarify equipment; an output archive might show completed scholarship; an engagement page could show a public-facing activity. The route with the most appealing title is not always the one that supplies the evidence needed for the question.

A University of Brescia search should match the problem with the record that can answer it

A focused University of Brescia inquiry can begin with a narrow problem and a stated setting. The problem could be a biological process, a clinical practice, a material, a technical system, an organisational decision, a language activity, a public-service issue, or a local environmental condition. The setting might be a laboratory, a health service, a manufacturing environment, a classroom, a library collection, a public institution, or a community organisation. From there, list what would allow the question to be examined: samples, test results, documents, interviews, observations, images, data, maps, source code, designs, or published research. This makes the university's public research routes easier to compare.

The available Brescia pages establish a broad set of directories, archives, facilities, centres, ethics routes, and engagement pathways. They do not confirm that a given department or researcher is currently addressing every problem that might be connected with those labels. They also do not prescribe a method for a reader's own investigation. To establish a reliable relationship, locate a specific page that names the activity and its material or setting. If the public record only maps a neighbouring field, it still offers a next avenue, yet no direct relationship follows from it.

Institution record

Country
Italy
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
M
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.