QS ranking profile
University of Genoa
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #530
- Up 17 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #547
- Overall score
- 30.8
Explore opportunities at University of Genoa
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#451 worldwide
#701 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#358 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#773 worldwide
#711 worldwide
#291 worldwide
#795 worldwide
#452 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Genoa
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
University of Genoa maps research through sea studies, risk, laboratories, and knowledge exchange
The University of Genoa makes several routes into research visible on its public site. These include study and research centres, departments, laboratories, libraries, interdepartmental centres, projects, publications, and researcher-search tools. The structure matters because a research centre, a laboratory, a publication, and a project page each answer a different question. A centre can show an area where people are organised. A laboratory can point to a setting for practical work. A publication or project description can give the closest public account of a defined finding or activity. A careful search moves from the broad map toward the most specific available record.
Two visible centres demonstrate why the object of study should determine the route. The Sea Study Centre brings teaching and research activity together around marine and maritime topics. The centre for security, risk, and vulnerability describes a transdisciplinary approach to those subjects. A question about a sea-related process may call for environmental measurements, vessel information, maps, legal records, field observations, or engineering models. A question about risk may involve infrastructure, public institutions, social practices, hazards, data, or policy. The shared university setting does not make the evidence or method interchangeable.
Marine topics and risk questions at Genoa call for different kinds of evidence
A marine question can be narrowed in several useful ways. It might concern a coastline, a marine organism, a navigation system, a port process, a vessel component, an environmental condition, or an industry practice. Each choice changes what a reader should look for next. Environmental work might need samples, sensors, satellite images, maps, or long-term measurements. A port or transport question could require operational records, policy documents, network data, interviews, or technical specifications. The Sea Study Centre offers an institutional starting point, but only a closer record can show how one defined object is being examined.
Security, risk, and vulnerability also need to be separated rather than used as interchangeable words. A risk question may concern an engineered system, a public service, a digital environment, a disaster setting, or a community decision. It may require incident records, system logs, interviews, legal texts, simulations, geographic information, or observation. The university's public description of a transdisciplinary centre is helpful because it leaves room for this range of evidence. It does not authorise a claim that every risk topic is represented there. The most reliable next step is to find a project, output, or researcher record that names the same setting and problem.
Follow Genoa's research catalogue and local records before drawing a narrow conclusion
For a University of Genoa search, begin by writing one clear question and the material needed to answer it. A question about a marine habitat may need observations, samples, images, or environmental data. A question about a port system may need maps, operational data, documents, and stakeholder accounts. A question about vulnerability may need an identified hazard, affected group, system boundary, and evidence trail. This preparation helps a reader use the university's project, researcher, laboratory, and publication routes purposefully. It avoids treating an attractive centre name as proof of an exact research match.
Genoa's public research navigation also lists a research catalogue, research ethics, and open-science routes. These are useful signs that the search can move beyond a general overview toward records with clearer context. Still, a central page cannot establish the current activity of any specific group or access to individual resources. A focused statement should rest on a source that explicitly joins a research object to a unit, person, project, or output. When no such link is visible, the appropriate result is an informed lead for further checking. That makes the University of Genoa profile accurate, specific, and usable.