QS ranking profile
University of Naples - Federico II
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #379
- Down 32 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #347
- Overall score
- 39.5
Explore opportunities at University of Naples - Federico II
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#241 worldwide
#438 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#292 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#86 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#550 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Extra large
- More than 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Naples - Federico II
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Federico II's Naples sites place historic fabric alongside a distributed research structure
The University of Naples Federico II presents an institutional setting spread across the city of Naples. Its public history page dates the university's foundation to 1224 and explains that its oldest buildings are in Naples's historic centre. The same page describes a broad academic structure that includes twenty-six departments and forty-three research centres. These facts help explain why a university name alone is not a sufficiently precise research description. A question can sit in a department, research centre, campus location, or cross-cutting activity, and each kind of page may offer a different level of detail about the work being done.
The institutional overview also presents the university through organisation, campus locations, professors and researchers, education, research, and third mission activity. Those headings show that the public site separates governance, academic structure, scholarly work, and wider forms of engagement. This distinction matters for research discovery. An organisational page can explain where a department sits. A research-centre page can offer a closer setting. A public story can describe one event or result. A reader should not treat any one of these records as a substitute for the others, especially when the goal is to understand a defined research object rather than a broad institutional theme.
Unina's public routes distinguish research from education, organisation, and third mission work
Federico II's central navigation gives research its own route alongside university information, education, third mission activity, international opportunities and services, and university services. This is a useful reminder that different public pages answer different questions. A research page may point to a project, a laboratory, a publication, or a research centre. An education page may describe a course or academic area. A university page may explain institutional responsibilities or locations. Third mission material can show how the university describes knowledge exchange and civic-facing work. These records can complement one another, but they do not carry the same evidential weight for a particular research question.
The public history page also identifies academic freedom, ethics and integrity, sustainability, innovation, international dialogue and cooperation, academic entrepreneurship, and cross-training among the university's stated values or directions. These statements give context for how Federico II presents its institutional mission. They do not establish a current method, topic, or resource in an individual department or centre. A careful profile keeps mission-level language separate from a locally documented research activity. That boundary makes it possible to use the public map without transforming a general value statement into proof for every unit.
A Federico II question gains clarity when a local record names the object and setting
For the University of Naples Federico II, begin with a short statement about the object to be investigated. It could be a molecular process, a built environment, a historical source, a communication network, an environmental condition, a legal issue, or a social practice. Then state the evidence needed to examine it: laboratory results, samples, measurements, maps, archival documents, software, images, interviews, surveys, public records, or field observations. This simple pairing gives a reader a way to move from a city-wide institutional overview toward a department, research centre, project, or researcher page that may address the same object.
Keep the final conclusion limited to what the closest public record supports. A central Federico II page can show that research, organisation, and third mission activity are visibly separated. It cannot verify how a particular group is currently directed or whether a person is available, nor can it supply an exact method behind a broad topic. When a local page describes both the object and research context, that is the stronger connection. When it names only a general discipline or value, keep it as a lead for further checking. This produces a useful profile without turning a wide institutional picture into an unsupported claim.