QS ranking profile
Kyushu University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #170
- Down 3 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #167
- Overall score
- 59.3
Explore opportunities at Kyushu University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#130 worldwide
#140 worldwide
#121 worldwide
#534 worldwide
#657 worldwide
#502 worldwide
#468 worldwide
#416 worldwide
#710 worldwide
#241 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Asia
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Kyushu University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
A research map that moves from broad fields to named settings
Kyushu University presents research across humanities and social sciences, art and design, life and health, mathematics and data, physics and chemistry, materials technology, and environment and sustainability. This layout is useful because it gives a topic more than one possible route without suggesting that all related work happens in the same place. A question about sustainable materials, for example, may touch chemistry, materials technology, environmental questions, and data analysis. The central categories help identify the first door to open. The next step is to locate the school, research centre, project, or researcher that gives the question a real academic setting.
The university's research pages also distinguish research results, researcher profiles, research centres and projects, activity support, collaboration support, and research integrity. Those are different kinds of information. A recent research result can show a concrete finding, while a centre can show a continuing home for work and an integrity page can describe shared expectations. None of those pages alone establishes the exact direction of a particular group. Keeping the layers separate is especially helpful when a topic looks broad on a central page but depends on a specialised method, dataset, material, or partnership at a smaller unit.
Centres make energy, health, regional studies, and community questions more concrete
Kyushu University identifies several research settings that make its public map more specific. They include the Platform of Inter- and Transdisciplinary Energy Research, the Institute for Asian and Oceanian Studies, the Center of Coevolutionary Research for Sustainable Communities, the Center for Clinical and Translational Research, and the Hisayama Study. These names point to distinct research contexts rather than a single institutional theme. Energy work can require technical systems and policy questions; regional studies can involve languages, histories, or contemporary connections; clinical and population work requires a different kind of evidence again. A comparison should begin with the setting closest to the object of study rather than collecting every related label.
Current research stories also show the variety behind those categories. The public record includes work on the early stages of star formation, a catalyst for mixed-plastic recycling, food preservation, and a theoretical framework related to quantum gravity. These examples do not define the work of every department, but they illustrate why a subject label needs closer reading. Someone interested in materials could look for a named laboratory or centre and then determine whether its work concerns chemistry, manufacturing, energy, environmental consequences, or another question. The central research portal is a starting map, not a substitute for that local check.
Trace a Kyushu University connection through evidence, support, and collaboration
A practical Kyushu University record can start with one research problem in plain language, followed by one field category and one named setting. Then add the form of evidence or activity that makes the connection meaningful: a physical process, clinical question, cohort, regional context, computational model, material, or energy system. The university also makes technological consultation, joint research, intellectual property management, and wider industry-university-government collaboration visible. These routes may matter where a topic has an external partner or applied dimension, but they should be checked against the local group rather than treated as a standard feature of every project.
Finish with what the public pages do not resolve. A centre may confirm that a question belongs in a research area while leaving the current project or supervisory fit unclear. A research story may show a result without revealing the full method or the team’s ongoing priorities. That uncertainty is valuable because it prevents a broad connection from becoming an overstatement. Kyushu University offers an unusually wide set of visible entry points, from disciplinary fields to named centres and collaboration services. A focused evidence trail helps turn those entry points into a useful comparison of a real academic setting.