QS ranking profile
Ritsumeikan University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #680
- Down 39 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #641
- Overall score
- 25.9
Explore opportunities at Ritsumeikan University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#493 worldwide
#187 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#525 worldwide
#766 worldwide
#704 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#413 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Extra large
- More than 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Comprehensive
- Teaches across all main faculty areas
- Research intensity
- High
- High research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Asia
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Ritsumeikan University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Ritsumeikan University spans Kyoto, Shiga, and Osaka through colleges and graduate schools
Ritsumeikan University describes itself as a comprehensive private university with 17 colleges and 22 graduate schools across campuses in Kyoto, Shiga, and Osaka Prefectures. Its public description also frames the university through freedom and innovation, diverse values, mutual respect, connections with society, and inquiry pursued in different ways. The scale matters less as a number than as a reminder that a research topic may be surrounded by several academic settings. A question about a city, for example, may involve design, law, history, data, environmental conditions, or the daily experience of residents. The same question needs a clear centre before those connections become useful.
A reader can approach Ritsumeikan's breadth by stating what exactly needs to be understood. It could be a textile structure, a chemical process, a public institution, a historical account, a digital system, or an interaction between people. The place where the question happens also changes the work. Kyoto, Shiga, and Osaka are not interchangeable backgrounds, and neither are a laboratory, a classroom, a workplace, a community, or an archive. Once the object and setting are named, a large university becomes easier to navigate. The relevant academic route is the one that can engage with that particular problem in enough detail.
Textile defects, dye detoxification, and child interactions show different Ritsumeikan research questions
The Ritsumeikan research pages place several recent subjects side by side: defect propagation in textile structures, the difference between decolorization and detoxification in work involving RB5, and understanding human nature through interactions between children and others. These subjects are not variations of one general innovation theme. Textile-structure work can centre on the relationship between fibres, construction, defects, and mechanical behaviour. Work on dye treatment must distinguish a visible loss of colour from a change in harmful chemical properties. Research on human interaction has different materials again, such as observed behaviour, language, relationships, or a setting where people meet.
That contrast is valuable for turning interest into an answerable question. A textile investigation might ask how a structural feature affects the movement of a defect. A chemical question might ask what compounds remain after a treatment process and how those compounds behave. An interaction question might ask how a particular form of communication shapes what children notice, express, or learn. The subject nouns may appear on the same university page, but they need different forms of observation and interpretation. Ritsumeikan's current topics make this difference visible without requiring a reader to treat all research as the same kind of activity.
Research Forefront, RADIANT, and named research organisations offer different ways to follow a topic
Ritsumeikan separates Research Forefront, RADIANT, research activities, research organisations, institutes and centres, a researcher database, research brochures, a research office, and research support information. Those routes serve different purposes. A Research Forefront item can introduce a particular line of inquiry. RADIANT can give a different public view of research activity. An organisation, institute, or centre can show where work is gathered. A researcher database can help identify people working in an area. A brochure or office page may explain a wider structure around the work. Treating all of these as the same kind of information would make a search less clear.
For Ritsumeikan, begin by writing one line that identifies the change, where it occurs, and what can be examined. The line might concern a defect moving through a textile, chemical change during treatment, a conversation between children, or a regional issue that needs several fields. Then ask whether the next useful step is to find a research story, an academic unit, a researcher, or a cross-field centre. This order keeps the question in charge of the search. It also allows a reader to see how a university's colleges, graduate schools, and research routes can contribute to a specific enquiry without turning institutional breadth into a claim by itself.